🚀 go-pugleaf

On 24 Apr, 05:21, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Apr 23, 9:13 pm, "foolsrushin." <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote
> > On 24 Apr, 04:40, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 23, 8:30�pm, "foolsrushin." <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 24 Apr, 01:49, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > Out there in rest of the entire universe time is ticking away
> > > > > simultaneously to everywhere else. They are in their now. There is no
> > > > > past or future just now since the beginning of time. There has never
> > > > > been anything but Now which can be called proper time. Now could be a
> > > > > slow time rate but it doesn't appear different. To it there still is
> > > > > the same order as would happen in all time rates.
> > > > > Mitch Raemsch
> > > > Yes, God!
> > > > The point is, though, that thousands of far from credulous aviators
> > > > and responsible 'terrans' have reported crafts whose properties
> > > > suggested they had no mass and 'infinite' speed!
> > > > ***************************************************************************­­­********
>
> > (snip)
>
> > > > Were such a story unique, I'd be the first to debunk Moody. The fact
> > > > is, though, that there have been many hundreds of similar encounters
> > > > across the globe, often involving *impossible* aerial manoeuvres, and
> > > > preposterous excuses to the abductees for their uninvited and
> > > > unwelcome intrusions.
>
> > > > As regards simultaneity, disappearnce from a location combined with
> > > > [instant] reappearnce at another, is frequently reported.
>
> > > > And yet, even the cargo cults get more attention!
> > > > --
> > > > 'foolsrushin.'
>
> > > They had some lights here in Phoenix last night, but it turned out to
> > > be four flares tied to balloons.
> > > Robert B. Winn.
>
> > Why didn't you go out to sea in a cathedra under a thousand helium
> > balloons, fuckwit? Anyway, one more for the Darwin Awards. The wind
> > was the wrong way, the sat phone ran down, and the stoopid couldn't
> > turn on his positioner, probably turned it off, else we'd have it by
> > now! Catholic priests were once required to know Latin (still are, of
> > course) *and* Ancient Greek, but even the decent Ancient Geeks, alas,
> > could not have saved that one, thus cheating the Awards. Anyway, let
> > us know your future plans so that we may watch. Push off, twit. No,
> > that's the bathroom!
> > --
> > 'foolsrushin.'
>
> So what are you, an Androcles apprentice?
> Robert B. Winn

I am an epistemologist, who, like Bertrand Russell, wondered,
ironically, after investigating Skinner, if the thought required a
thinker. 'Polly wants a cracker! Polly wants a cracker!' An actual one
almost took my fingers off! Huge! The cat kept well away from it!
--
'foolsrushin.'