🚀 go-pugleaf

On 13 Mar, 20:57, cabbage <fhe...@tvstar.com> wrote:
> On Mar 13, 9:43 pm, foolsrushin <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On 13 Mar, 19:23, cabbage <fhe...@tvstar.com> wrote:
> > > On Mar 14, 8:27 am, "Arthur Knight" <arthurknig...@optusnet.com.au>
> > > wrote:
> > > > "The Key" to finding the answers to your questions within science about the
> > > > universe:.is by extrapolating from a purely physical inevitable acting
> > > > universe indestructible, eternal and made up of only Matter its Motion and
> > > > Space..with a corollary of Absolute, Time, Speed and positions in Space
> > > > Arthur Knight.
> > > wold you mind putting it succinctly in
> > > five easy steps, thanks
> > The reason might be quite different: some Thing or just some state of
> > things is forcing you to adjust or at least extenuate absurdities - to
> > the point whereby, one day, you will have to modify physics in an
> > attempt to account for the New Thinking. Just like you, they went down
> > the path of maths or physics, seeking approbiation. I am not
> > suggesting you get yourself thrown out of town: I do suggest that you
> > THINK! IBM once issued such a notice, to be pasted over every desk!
> > What do *you* suppose was wrong with that idea?
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhqJZ47mf24

[The reporter is the reporter for tansport, Chicago Tribue - but of
what? Delicious.]

> > --
> > 'foolsrushin.'
> IBM was gay and is still gay
> IBM put numbers on my people, what a shame.

Don't know about that, but I do know that we just do not take
seriously stuff that does not simply turn physics on its head but
suggests a new business model for travel even from A to A: stasis over
O'Hare airport! The thing was gone in an instant, punching a hole in
the overcast. No physics 101 on this one!
--
Yrs,
John.