🚀 go-pugleaf

On 13 Mar, 22:32, "Pmb" <some...@someplace.com> wrote:
> "foolsrushin" <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:069619bd-725f-42e3-a465-d160a649c296@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On 13 Mar, 20:10, "Pmb" <some...@someplace.com> wrote:
> > "cabbage" <fhe...@tvstar.com> wrote in message
> >news:822bf9b1-dc25-41fb-8477-0dcdcbd1bf9c@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Mar 13, 8:14 pm, cabbage <fhe...@tvstar.com> wrote:
> > >> instinctively somthen must be wrong here,
> > >> they are call americans for astronauts
> > >> while the russians and rest of tha world they
> > >> call cosmonauts
> > >> why this discrepancy also in relativity
> > >> i mean, they do tha same job
> > >> why difrent names?
> > > and to continue our discusion
> > > tha russians been first on planet mars, and
> > > discovered ancient civilizations and other
> > > structures
> > > where are these pictures?
> > I've never heard anything like that before in my life. Where did you get
> > this idea from??? If I were you I'd try searching the internet for those
> > topics.
> > Pete
> >That is true. But Richard Hoagland
> There is no way on Earth I'd ever believe that. Especially for the sole
> reason that someone I know nothing about merely makes a claim.
> >http://www.enterprisemission.com/
> I'm aware of Hoagland and his ideas and I know that he has never been able
> to accept the truth. Better pictures were taken on mars which proved him
> wrong. He then went of an a conspiracy theory tangent which tells me that he
> will never accept the truth, even if it bit him on the ass.
> >fights his corner ably every step of the way.
> >Check him out! Shills and plants rely only on the claims of NASA:
> >Hoagland does better than well with the bits of data he can get.
> >How can an aircraft sit still in the air over O'Hare Airport, Chicag0,
> >for about 15 minutes -
> >http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case958.htm
> This has nothing to do with the subject of this thread.
> Pete

Hoagland, as a matter of fact, works more like a lawyer than a
scietist, suggesting, and illustrating, how the evidence may have been
tampered with, and almost never reaching a definitive conclusion in
any particular case. A good analogy would be the way the Mob was
brought down, to some extent, by the FBI. On balance, those guys were
up to no good, but you needed to put a lot of bits together, some bits
very frightened to talk!

Anyway, you studiously ignore the O'Hare report. Good news for bad
physics! If Irish physics works, it works! Ain't that grand!
--
'foolsrushin.'