🚀 go-pugleaf

"foolsrushin" <dolomite8@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1b494654-8e26-4dcf-94a1-53bcfc2d9591@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On 13 Mar, 22:32, "Pmb" <some...@someplace.com> wrote:
>> "foolsrushin" <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:069619bd-725f-42e3-a465-d160a649c296@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> On 13 Mar, 20:10, "Pmb" <some...@someplace.com> wrote:
>> > "cabbage" <fhe...@tvstar.com> wrote in message
>> >news:822bf9b1-dc25-41fb-8477-0dcdcbd1bf9c@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > On Mar 13, 8:14 pm, cabbage <fhe...@tvstar.com> wrote:
>> > >> instinctively somthen must be wrong here,
>> > >> they are call americans for astronauts
>> > >> while the russians and rest of tha world they
>> > >> call cosmonauts
>> > >> why this discrepancy also in relativity
>> > >> i mean, they do tha same job
>> > >> why difrent names?
>> > > and to continue our discusion
>> > > tha russians been first on planet mars, and
>> > > discovered ancient civilizations and other
>> > > structures
>> > > where are these pictures?
>> > I've never heard anything like that before in my life. Where did you 
>> > get
>> > this idea from??? If I were you I'd try searching the internet for 
>> > those
>> > topics.
>> > Pete
>> >That is true. But Richard Hoagland
>> There is no way on Earth I'd ever believe that. Especially for the sole
>> reason that someone I know nothing about merely makes a claim.
>> >http://www.enterprisemission.com/
>> I'm aware of Hoagland and his ideas and I know that he has never been 
>> able
>> to accept the truth. Better pictures were taken on mars which proved him
>> wrong. He then went of an a conspiracy theory tangent which tells me that 
>> he
>> will never accept the truth, even if it bit him on the ass.
>> >fights his corner ably every step of the way.
>> >Check him out! Shills and plants rely only on the claims of NASA:
>> >Hoagland does better than well with the bits of data he can get.
>> >How can an aircraft sit still in the air over O'Hare Airport, Chicag0,
>> >for about 15 minutes -
>> >http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case958.htm
>> This has nothing to do with the subject of this thread.
>> Pete
>
> Hoagland, as a matter of fact, works more like a lawyer than a
> scietist, suggesting, and illustrating, how the evidence may have been
> tampered with, and almost never reaching a definitive conclusion in
> any particular case. A good analogy would be the way the Mob was
> brought down, to some extent, by the FBI. On balance, those guys were
> up to no good, but you needed to put a lot of bits together, some bits
> very frightened to talk!
>
> Anyway, you studiously ignore the O'Hare report.

That is incorrect. How could I ignore something I never heard of?

Pete