🚀 go-pugleaf

H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<6ne1o05f4ml8vs8fffqmqd6k09bh6b3ogt@4ax.com>...
> On 28 Oct 2004 01:39:31 -0700, titanpoint@yahoo.com (Titan Point) wrote:
> 
> >H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<m780o01r64c36f6rc53ljm80tcvgtqvncp@4ax.com>...
> >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:08:43 GMT, Bill Rowe <readnewscix@earthlink.net.invalid>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >In article <mp0rn0luu869k5au65n99n1aua44vd4pe6@4ax.com>,
> >> > H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> As far as I can see, Einstein's version of relativity was never taken 
> >> >> seriously outside of the USA and GB. It is a western hoax, 
> >> >> perpetuated by generations of academic inbreeding.
> >> >
> >> >This merely demonstrates your myopic view. I am certain the Galileo 
> >> >system planned by ESA will definitely make use of relativity just as the 
> >> >US GPS system. Additionally, I believe the Russians also built a system 
> >> >similar to GPS which also must have considered relativity. So, your idea 
> >> >relativity is taken seriously by just the US and GB is simply fantasy.
> >> 
> >> I'm sure the orbiting clocks will be software adjusted so that they will be in
> >> synch with the ground clocks.
> >> 
> >> HW.
> >
> >Why should that happen, unless they were going out of synchronization
> >due to motion and position in the Earth's gravitational field?
> 
> Clocks change rates slightly when relieved of gravitational self compresion
> They are also affected by cutting the Earths fields. 

Is this the best you can come up with?

How does "graviational self-compression" affect the transition between
energy levels of an electron in a caesium atom? Please quantify with
actual mathematics and data of this so-called effect.

Otherwise people might think you were just making this up.