🚀 go-pugleaf

Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote:
> Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote:
>> Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>>
>> >Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote:
>> >> Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A <double-a@hush.ai> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >nightbat wrote:
>> >> >> >> nightbat wrote
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Black Knight wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > "Henry Haapalainen" <kirppu@kolumbus.fi> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > news:dl0j28$7vp$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi...
>> >> >> >> > > If that kind of list is needed would you at least consider to
>> >> >> >> > > rename
>> >> >> >> > > it.
>> >> >> >> > > I
>> >> >> >> > > don't recognize many of those names. I wonder, for instance, why
>> >> >> >> > > Nick
>> >> >> >> > > is
>> >> >> >> > > mentioned. Is the list fair?
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Henry Haapalainen
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > You want FAIR? From Hammond? Almost everyone wants to be on that
>> >> >> >> > list,
>> >> >> >> > why should Nick be left out? He's not an arse-kissing bilbe-thumping
>> >> >> >> > relativist moron, he's an ordinary moron.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Androcles.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> nightbat
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>         Well yes, some lesser known coffee boys are now permitted for
>> >> >> >> heck somebody has to serve the science elite their coffee.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>         carry on,
>> >> >> >>         the nightbat
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Hi nightbat,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >While I suppose being on this list is traditionally a great honor, I
>> >> >> >still can't see why my name should be on it since I could only find
>> >> >> >that I had interacted with Hammond once, and that was a long time ago,
>> >> >> >and only a few words, and no great insults.  I think he must have
>> >> >> >copied some of us off of somebody else's list.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >To be on the same list as Michael Baldwin Bruce is pretty depressing!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Ah, so sad, the profound elite earth space science saucerhead is so
>> >> >> oppressed.
>> >> >
>> >> >And the saucerhead is of lowly rank, being below me in the lits. And
>> >> >that's after him interacting with this Hammond kook. That speaks
>> >> >volumes for the power of my poasts.
>> >>
>> >> Indeed it does, Bruce, and of the futility of standard saucerhead gaga.
>> >
>> >All we hear is futile standard saucerhead gaga, Bruce.
>>
>> You can say that again, Bruce.
> 
> All we hear is futile standard saucerhead gaga, Bruce.

You can say that again, Bruce.
-- 
ah