🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jun 29, 10:34 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Einstein comdemning the old rat to death in 1954:
>
> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf/files/975547d7-2d00-433a-b7e3-4a...
> Albert Einstein 1954: "I consider it entirely possible that physics
> cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous
> structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air,
> including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of
> contemporary physics."
>
> The statement "physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is
> on continuous structures" is somewhat obscure but here are three clues
> to Einstein's verdict:
>
> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/genius/
> "Genius Among Geniuses" by Thomas Levenson
> "And then, in June, Einstein completes special relativity, which adds
> a twist to the story: Einstein's March paper treated light as
> particles, but special relativity sees light as a continuous field of
> waves. Alice's Red Queen can accept many impossible things before
> breakfast, but it takes a supremely confident mind to do so. Einstein,
> age 26, sees light as wave and particle, picking the attribute he
> needs to confront each problem in turn. Now that's tough."
>
> http://books.google.com/books?id=JokgnS1JtmMC
> "Relativity and Its Roots" By Banesh Hoffmann
> p.92: "Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had
> suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one,
> the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding
> train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the
> speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object
> emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume
> that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to
> Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null
> result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to
> contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as
> we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null
> result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian
> ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more
> or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether."
>
> http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm
> Bryan Wallace: "Einstein's special relativity theory with his second
> postulate that the speed of light in space is constant is the linchpin
> that holds the whole range of modern physics theories together.
> Shatter this postulate, and modern physics becomes an elaborate farce!
> (...) The speed of light is c+v."
>
> Yet the old rat survives for a simple reason. Replacing Einstein's
> 1905 false light postulate with its true antithesis, the equation c'=c
> +v given by Newton's emission theory of light (v is the relative speed
> of the emitter and the observer), is tantamount to replacing
> Einstein's theory with Newton's theory, and this is unbearable for
> Einsteinians. So they are waiting for the genius who would reject
> Einstein's 1905 false light postulate without killing the old rat
> (Einstein's relativity). They simply cannot lose the old rat. There is
> nothing else on their planet:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Petit-Prince-French-Language/dp/0156013983
> "Hem! Hem! dit le roi, je crois bien que sur ma planète il y a quelque
> part un vieux rat. Je l'entends la nuit. Tu pourras juger ce vieux
> rat. Tu le condamneras à mort de temps en temps. Ainsi sa vie dépendra
> de ta justice. Mais tu le gracieras chaque fois pour l'économiser. Il
> n'y en a qu'un."
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Little-Prince-Antoine-Saint-Exup%C3%A9ry/dp/015...
> "Hum! Hum!" said the king. "I have good reason to believe that
> somewhere on my planet there is an old rat. I hear him at night. You
> can judge this old rat. From time to time you will condemn him to
> death. Thus his life will depend on your justice. But you will pardon
> him on each occasion; for he must be treated thriftily. He is the only
> one we have."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

If the quantum is infinitely small point particle then it can fit into
the space-time continuum perfectly. Einstein's castle is preserved.

Mitch Raemsch