🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 28, 5:48 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Einsteiniana's textbooks teach that cosmic-ray muons moving with a
> speed close to c live much longer than muons "at rest", and that this
> gloriously confirms Divine Albert's Divine Theory. Then textbooks
> explain how the lifetime of moving muons is measured but NEVER mention
> the experimental procedure allowing Einsteinians to assess the
> lifetime of muons "at rest". How do Einsteinians measure the lifetime
> of muons "at rest"?

Don't be ridiculous. Muons have been produced at slow enough speeds to
capture them and replace electrons with them in atoms.

I can't help it if you are both singularly unversed in the vast wealth
of experimental information available to you (and so you insist that
it JUST ISN'T THERE!), and completely incapable of digging any of it
up.

Being able to look things up is a fundamental and indispensable skill
for anyone wanting to do science. If you are crippled at this skill,
do not expect people to compensate for your disability.

> When cosmic-ray muons bump into an obstacle so
> that their speed instantly changes from about 300000km/s to zero,

But this is not what happens in a typical cosmic ray telescope,
despite the one case you have looked up. Good grief.

Grow up.

> their forced and quick disintegration makes Einsteinians extremely
> happy. Why? Simply because the scientific rationality is so devastated
> that, as the muon undergoes such a terrible crash, Einsteinians can
> safely say 'Lo, a muon at rest' and infer that non-crashing muons live
> longer than crashing muons in perfect accordance with Divine Albert's
> Divine Theory:
>