🚀 go-pugleaf

On 16 mai, 08:09, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 15, 10:23 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ETHERISTS:
>
> >http://www.eng.uwi.tt/depts/elec/staff/sgift/special_relativity.pdf
> > The Invalidation of a Sacred Principle of Modern Physics
> > Stephan J.G. Gift
> > "The principle underpinning modern physics, which states that the
> > speed of light is
> > constant and independent of the motion of the source and the observer,
> > is shown
> > to be invalid. (...) For a stationary observer O, the stationary light
> > source S emits light at speed c, wavelength Lo, and frequency Fo given
> > by Fo=c/Lo. If the observer moves toward S at speed v, then again
> > based on classical analysis, the speed of light relative to the moving
> > observer is (c + v) and not c as required by Einstein's law of light
> > propagation. Hence the observer intercepts wave-fronts of light at a
> > frequency fA, which is higher than Fo, as is observed, and is given by
> > fA = (c+v)/Lo > Fo. (...) In light of this elementary result
> > invalidating STR, it is difficult to understand why this invalid
> > theory has been (and continues to be) accepted for the past 100 years.
> > It is time to reject STR with its incorrect light speed invariance
> > principle long pointed out by Ives, and return to the Lorentz-Maxwell
> > ether-based theory elucidated by Ives and summarized by Erlichson."
>
> > EINSTEINIANS:
>
> >http://sampit.geol.sc.edu/Doppler.html
> > "Moving observer: A man is standing on the beach, watching the tide.
> > The waves are washing into the shore and over his feet with a constant
> > frequency and wavelength. However, if he begins walking out into the
> > ocean, the waves will begin hitting him more frequently, leading him
> > to perceive that the wavelength of the waves has decreased."
>
> >http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/big_bang/ind...
> > John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer
> > were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now
> > pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would
> > mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to
> > have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE
> > BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)."
>
> > Pentcho Valev
> > pva...@yahoo.com
>
> Aether flow over energy as time is central to Aether physics.
>
> MItch Raemsch

And if I fart, what is the propagation speed of the odor?

Y.B.