🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #425

Re: SAVING PHYSICS: TWO POSTULATES

#425
From: bill
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 07:54
25 lines
2477 bytes
On May 20, 3:57 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Physics is dying:
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/nov/22/schools.g2
> ........instead
> of celebrating, physicists are in mourning after a report showed a
> dramatic decline in the number of pupils studying physics at school.

In their book 'The Matter Myth' Paul Davies and John Gribbin wrote
(22, Viking, 1991) -

"Do atoms really exist? Does the aether really exist? The answers seem
to be, respectively, 'perhaps' and 'probably not'; but science can
never tell us. Faced with this limitation, some people may prefer to
reject science altogether..."

Firstly - I believe that it was irresponsible for them to write
"...science can never tell us..."

Secondly, the term 'limitation' is, in my opinion, more correctly
described as 'uncertainty' or 'confusion' and it is this fact that, I
believe, has driven people - students in particular - away from the
subject of physics however it seems to me that many physicist/authors
deliberately foster uncertainty in order to restrict the number of
potential competitors for limited funding/job opportunities.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <325867ac-b8f3-4d97-acac-b45e7cdf9f09@a16g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a16g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <9dee31fe-bc4e-4f1f-a8ca-e4e22e0a4200@o1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: a846ae8c3c,1afc431902ecce9a
X-Google-Attributes: gida846ae8c3c,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a16g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: bill <cosmosco@optusnet.com.au>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
Subject: Re: SAVING PHYSICS: TWO POSTULATES
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 00:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <325867ac-b8f3-4d97-acac-b45e7cdf9f09@a16g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <9dee31fe-bc4e-4f1f-a8ca-e4e22e0a4200@o1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.78.20.250
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1274342059 14474 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2010 07:54:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 07:54:19 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a16g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=114.78.20.250; 
 posting-account=-EhAuAoAAAC442idEIvctKWOndJMW4kt
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; 
 rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3,gzip(gfe)