🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 20, 3:11 pm, Stamenin <task...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry Pentcho, but I do not feel that you are the man who defends the
> physics as I believed. You and all others who try to critic Einstein's
> SR and GR by speaking only about the light phenomena could be
> considered that they are doing so intentionally in fact to obstruct
> the real critics against this moronic theory. To me it feels as a big
> hypocrisy in physics. No one can critic the Einstein relativity
> without the critic of the Lorentz transformation and of the Principle
> of the equivalence of the gravitational force and the inertial force.
> These are the two principal mistakes in his theory of relativity.

=============

> So I
> do not believe that  physic is dying but is a shame for the scientists
> all over the word, and especially for English scientists, because
> Einstein negates Newton theory with his false theory. This is true,
> because you can't mix the light phenomena with the phenomena of the
> motion of material bodies. The material bodies have mass, but light
> has not. That is shown by the mathematical formulas of the second
> Newton law, and the law of universal attraction.

The affliction is probably related to lime or something in
soil of the British isles. The French seem to have no difficulty
mixing all manner of things harmoniously.

http://www.answers.com/topic/haute-cuisine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizeau_experiment

:-))

Sue...