🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 12, 12:19 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 6, 5:21 pm, Marvin the Martian wrote:
>
> > Indeed, the fact that there was asymmetry in Maxwell's equations with
> > regard to electromagnetic induction ruled out a rest frame
>
> This is not true.  Because of Maxwell's equations, the mid-to-
> late-19th-century physicists all believed in the Aether --- an
> absolute frame of reference.  As Professor Roberts fondly would say
> "you need to study the subject at hand" and follow up by a <shrug>.
> So, <shrug>
>
> > and lead to
> > the investigation of how the equations DO transform.
>
> Oh, yes, you can transform all you want, but try not to play a fast
> one by introducing mathemagics into all these steps, OK?
>
> > That lead to the
> > Lorentz transformation, which is the mathematics that powers SR.
>
> Yes, indeed.  PD, the unemployed professor, does not think so.
> <shrug>
>
> Oh, by the way, the Lorentz transform was actually transformed a few
> times.  The very original version of the Lorentz transform must
> reference back to the absolute frame of reference as the results of
> the MMX demand.  You see.  All transforms including the Galilean
> (circa 16th century), the Voigt (1887), and the Lorentz (Larmor's
> version 1890's, Poincare's version 1904-5 or so) transforms involve
> three points/frames/parties.  They are two observers and one
> observed.  In Larmor's Lorentz transform, one of these observers must
> be the absolute frame of reference.  Poincare made a mistake in his
> mathematics.  In doing so, any of these two observers does not have to
> be the absolute frame of reference.  Yours truly did explain this in a
> greater detail.  See the post below.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/c540aaf2341...
>
> So, Maxwell's equations, after all, still require the absolute frame
> of reference if the mistake of Poincare is exorcised.  Poincare's
> version of the Lorentz transform (plagiarized by Einstein the nitwit,
> the plagiarist, and the liar) is only valid in a very special
> circumstance.  Thus, the Lorentz transform as you know of cannot be
> valid in general.  <shrug>
>
> So, stop gulping down cans of fermented diarrhea of Einstein the
> nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar.  <shrug>

Your shoulders must get awefully sore.