🚀 go-pugleaf

On Apr 1, 11:29 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics_x> wrote:
> "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alie...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:43e7d4aa-1475-4118-bd00-817560cc5d5e@j41g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 1, 7:23 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics_x> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> "waldofj" <wald...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:615dc4f3-470e-486a-8a60-2630c6ed8813@n34g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Apr 1, 5:18 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > According to Maxwell's theory, (1) the speed of light is independent
> >> > of the speed of the emitter but (2) it does depend on the speed of the
> >> > observer:
>
> >> according to Maxwell's equations the speed of light is equal to 1/
> >> sqrt(ep_0 * mu_0).
> >> nowhere in his equations are ep_0 or mu_0 dependent on the speed of
> >> the observer.
> > ================================================
> > ep_0 and mu_0 are properties of aether and like the speed of sound
> > in vacuum and the Easter Bunny, they don't exist.
> > Maxwell was dead when Michelson did his famous experiment.
> > When the aether died its properties died with it.
> > Goodbye ep_0 and mu_0.
> > (You can still have ep_1, mu_1, sound in air and chocolate eggs).
> > Goodbye idiot.
>
> Ridiculous.
> ======================================
> Yes, you are.
> It is NOT possible that I have made a mistake, you FUCKING LYING
> INCOMPETENT STOOOOOOOPID INSANE MORONIC ARROGANT
> COWARDLY FRAUDULENT BIGOT, AS ALWAYS
>
> The gauntlet is down. Shut the fuck up and get on with it, YOU LYING COWARD.
>
> In a simulation  "practical" means rotate faster and slow the simulated
> light down so the viewer can easily see what is going on, you ignorant
> arse.
> This is Andersen:
>    http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf
> Look at figure 3:
>  Read what Andersen says:
>  "The beams are slightly curved because..."
> But he doesn't animate it.
>
> I've animated it.
> In reality, the path lengths are accurate to the practical limits of finite
> pixel size, but the velocities are not - and neither are Tusseladd's.
> Mine works because I chose an exact integer wavelength in fixed frame.
>  LIKE THIS, you worthless bigot:
>    http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/CoriSag.gif
> You and Tusseladd are frauds!
>
> AND you ARE capable of significantly improving on it, you haven't tried
> because
> 1) You are too fuckin' LAZY,
> 2) You've already made up your pathetic mind, you fuckin' BIGOT!
> 3) You are fuckin' stooopid,
> 4) You are a troll,
> 5) ...
>
> I'll give Tusseladd a tad more credit than you, at least he's not as
> lazy as you are even if he's just as much a bigot.
>
> Your mission (should you decide to accept it) is to animate Tusseladd's
> Fig 3. using Java, allowing the user to set the speed to see what is going
> on in the rotating frame, the lab frame and the SR (=aether) frame.
> This tape will self-destruct in five months, that should be enough
> time.
>
> You may outdo Wilson, you lazy fraudulent bigot, and you can outdo
> my animation, but you will not defeat me.
> "Nope" is not an acceptable reply, nor are phase-shift jumps at
> the corners acceptable.
> The gauntlet is down. Shut the fuck up and get on with it YOU COWARDLY
> BIGOT!
>
> ===================================================
> You can whine and deny all to want to, fuckheaded bigot, but it's Einstein
> and Tom&Jeery you are denying.
>
> For a cosmic muon with v = 0.999c, it's natural lifespan = 2.2 usec.
> ref:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon
>
> Einstein's calculation is tau = t * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2),
> ref:http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img61.gif
>
> 2.2usec  * sqrt(1-0.999^2) =  0.098362 usec
>
> So cosmic muons which normally decay in 2.2 usec therefore map to "a
> narrower set of values tau in the relatively moving frame"(--Tom&Jeery)
> and only last for a maximum of 0.01 usec.
> "These effects are regularly seen" -- Tom&Jeery.
>
> I would estimate that more than likely you are a deranged insane old
> faggot called "Tom the Minor Crank", pretending he could be the
> pretty radiologist "Geraldine" he met in hospital when he went for an
> X-ray, living out his fantasies on usenet and believing anyone can be
> fooled by it.
>
> REPEAT:
> 2.2 usec in the stationary frame, tau = 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in the moving
> frame. Einstein's equation - not a thing you can do about it, I can squeeze
> your balls and you can only squeal. And I'm not letting go until you cry
> "uncle" or fuck off out of here, you bastard. I'm teaching physics to guys
> like Gehan and tords like you are in the way. Fucking weep, arsehole.
> It is NOT possible that I have made a mistake, you FUCKING LYING
> INCOMPETENT STOOOOOOOPID INSANE MORONIC ARROGANT
> COWARDLY FRAUDULENT BIGOT, AS ALWAYS!

Sticks and stones....