🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 8, 5:07 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 15:22:41 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 7, 4:42 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
> >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 6, 5:28 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
>
> >> >> Hahahahhhaaha! We're talking about Maxwell's wave equations...not general
> >> >> electromagnetic ones that were created long before Maxwell
>
> >> >Then perhaps you don't know what Maxwell's equations are. Would you
> >> >care to google them?
>
> >> Not only do I know what they are I also know what they mean.
>
> >Apparently not. Can you write them down here?
>
> just google them, diaper and you can see for yourself.

Oh, I know what they are. You don't. That's why you can't write them
down here, isn't it?

>
> >> >> >Say you want to know how to design an antenna to transmit your bootleg
> >> >> >all-porn FM channel. You know what will tell you that? Maxwell's
> >> >> >You haven't said how to generate what YOU call empty space. I presume
> >> >> >it is also devoid of angels and ectoplasm.
>
> >> >> Empty space exists below the WDT, which is the threshold at which the inverse
> >> >> square law breaks down and genuine 'holes of nothing' appear in space.
>
> >> >And how would you demonstrate or recreate this empty space to verify
> >> >its existence?
>
> >> I rely on variable star curves for all the evidence I need.
>
> >Do variable stars have empty space in them? Prove it.
>
> Moron. there is empty space between us and the stars.

Prove it.

>
> >> >Or are you happy to posit ectoplasm and angels over and over and over
> >> >again?
>
> >Hmmmm?

More ectoplasm?

>
> >> Here's anothe simple matchhttp://www.scisite.info/v899herc.jpg
>
> Henry Wilson...
>
> .......A relativist's IQ = his snipping ability.