Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #488Re: PIECES OF EINSTEINIANA PROVED CORRECT
From: eon
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 11:53
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 11:53
23 lines
2406 bytes
2406 bytes
On May 9, 12:01 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7695994/Largest-scientific-i... > "Professor Jim Hough, an expert on gravitational waves at Glasgow expert in something that does not exists > University and a member of the committee that drew up the plans, said: > "Gravitational waves are the last piece of Einstein's theory of > general relativity that has still to be proved correct." > > Pieces of Einsteiniana proved correct: > > http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16321935.300-ode-to-albert.html > New Scientist: Ode to Albert > "Enter another piece of luck for Einstein. We now know that the light- > bending effect was actually too small for Eddington to have discerned > at that time. Had Eddington not been so receptive to Einstein's > theory, he might not have reached such strong conclusions so soon, and > the world would have had to wait for more accurate eclipse > measurements to confirm general relativity." > the bending was difraction because the heat and smoke
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<f6af924a-9124-417c-9f70-352cbda7eb01@j36g2000prj.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j36g2000prj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<eadf4ab6-8cad-4b41-92f8-6191b1f80686@24g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: a846ae8c3c,735c3106f6422555 X-Google-Attributes: gida846ae8c3c,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j36g2000prj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: eon <ynes95v6@techemail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro Subject: Re: PIECES OF EINSTEINIANA PROVED CORRECT Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 04:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 24 Message-ID: <f6af924a-9124-417c-9f70-352cbda7eb01@j36g2000prj.googlegroups.com> References: <eadf4ab6-8cad-4b41-92f8-6191b1f80686@24g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 222.165.133.198 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1273406039 11895 127.0.0.1 (9 May 2010 11:53:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 11:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j36g2000prj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=222.165.133.198; posting-account=e13iGAoAAACy_AjK8wmXp9VvNTJ48E00 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 lvs022.sltidc.lk X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)