🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 6, 10:10 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 11:47 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 05 May 2010 08:54:13 -0500, Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org>
> > wrote:
>
> > >On Wed, 05 May 2010 08:50:29 +0000, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
>
> > >> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:00:49 -0500, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >>>On 4/30/10 3:34 AM, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > >>>> According to Maxwell's theory, the speed of light DOES depend on the
> > >>>> speed of the observer
>
> > >>>   Empirically verified.
>
> > >> Nice to see you have finally seen the light, Wormey
>
> > >> Henry Wilson...
>
> > >> .......A person's IQ = his snipping ability.
>
> > >I don't know where you three idiots get that, but no.
>
> > >Maxwell's equations are only invariant under the Lorentz transformation,
> > >and that preserves the speed of light regardless of the speed of the
> > >observer.
>
> > >But then, I shouldn't be wasting my time with physics ignoramuses who
> > >don't know lower division undergrad physics. (Okay, with things the way
> > >they are, it may now be UPPER division undergrad physics...)
>
> > There is no aether and no Lorentz transforms you dopey bastard.
> > Light is ballistic. Einstein's theory is crap.
>
> Well, let's see.
> Lorentz transforms are mathematical relations between coordinates.
> When you write them down on a piece of paper, they exist.
> Maxwell's equations superbly describe measured electrodynamics outside
> the quantum realm.
> It is easy to show the invariance of Maxwell's equations under the
> Lorentz transforms with some lines of algebra on a piece of paper.
> Once it's written down, it's pretty hard to deny that the
> demonstration has been done.
>
> Unless, of course, you clamp your eyes shut and mutter, "No-no-no-no-
> no. I won't look and you can't make me. I *deny* your reality and
> substitute my own."

You're just jealous of Henry Wilson DSc's genius. If you had any
professional integrity you'd see the truth.