🚀 go-pugleaf

When Einsteinians are sure that a particular constancy has nothing to
do with the Original Divine Constancy given by Einstein's 1905 false
light postulate, they boldly violate it, produce shock and horror in
Einstein zombie world, point to a Great Revolution in Science that is
just around the corner and make a lot of profit in terms of career and
money:

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=5538
Paul Davies: "Einstein's famous equation E=mc2 is the only scientific
formula known to just about everyone. The "c" here stands for the
speed of light. It is one of the most fundamental of the basic
constants of physics. Or is it? In recent years a few maverick
scientists have claimed that the speed of light might not be constant
at all. Shock, horror! Does this mean the next Great Revolution in
Science is just around the corner?"

Then Einsteinians quickly return to the classical miraculous
corollaries of Einstein's 1905 false light postulate that constitute
the main money-spinner in Einstein criminal cult:

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/davies/davies_index.html
Paul Davies: "Remarkably, Wells's story was written about ten years
before the publication of Einstein's special theory of relativity was
published. Special relativity showed that time is elastic, flexible.
It isn't simply there -- the same for everybody, as Newton supposed.
There's your time and my time, and they can differ depending on how we
move. If I jump in a rocket ship and head off at nearly the speed of
light to a nearby star and come back again ten earth years later, I
may have aged only, say, one year. This is called the twins effect,
because if I left my twin brother at home, when I returned we would no
longer be the same age. He would be ten years older, and I only one
year older. In effect, I will have time-travelled nine years into his
future. Bizarre though this time-stretching effect seems, we know it's
true.....Travel into the past is much more problematic, though. The
significant thing is, our best understanding of the nature of time,
which comes from Einstein's general theory of relativity, leaves open
the possibility of travel into the past. It doesn't say you can't do
it, there's no known law within the theory of relativity to forbid it.
But finding a plausible scenario to actually travel into the past is
not an easy thing......This topic is often cast in the parable of the
grandmother paradox: you go back 50 years and kill your grandmother,
ensuring that you were never born in the first place. One way around
it is that if you go to a parallel world, and kill your parallel
grandmother, you can return to your own time to find Granny still
alive and well. That's a possible resolution. There isn't any
consensus on it. Perhaps the existence of parallel realities is a
worse prospect than that of causal loop paradoxes......Einstein's
theory of relativity tells us that space is curved by gravity, so
imagine that it was warped in such a way that it connected earth with
the center of the galaxy through a tube or a tunnel that might only be
a few kilometers long -- who knows? The point is that if a wormhole is
possible, it can be adapted for use as a time machine, as shown by Kip
Thorne at Caltech, and his colleagues, and now the subject of an
international cottage industry in research papers. To travel in time,
what you do is this. You first plunge through the wormhole and exit at
the remote end, then you zoom back home again through ordinary space
at nearly the speed of light. If the circumstances are right, you can
get back before you leave."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com