Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5346Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:18
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:18
83 lines
6333 bytes
6333 bytes
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/mar/13-e-nste-n On Feb 28, 9:12 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Sixth Next Einstein Ed Witten deeply understands how Einstein > camouflaged the falsehood of his 1905 light postulate: > > http://www.claymath.org/Popular_Lectures/Edward_Witten/ > Ed Witten: "I've tried to illustrate this by this little magic square > where in the upper left I draw a picture that's meant to symbolize a > conception based on Einstein's special relativity, dating to the early > 20th century, of a massless particle traveling at the speed of light > in spacetime. In the picture, space runs horizontally, time runs > vertically, and the massless particle travels at a 45 degree angle > which is meant to illustrate propagation at the speed of light. Now > this is a very naive idea, and Einstein elaborated it into the > nonlinear wave equations for which he's really famous \ the Einstein > equations which assert that the Ricci tensor of spacetime is zero. > These equations encode Einstein's amazingly profound mathematical > insight describing just how the curvature of the universe leads to > gravitation. So Einstein gave one profound generalization of the naive > idea of a light ray in spacetime...." This sixth new Einstein seems to be something very very special: http://www.yogacara.net/node/21042 "Edward Witten, who is probably one of the smartest people on Earth and quite possibly the world's greatest living theoretical physicist." http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,994019,00.html "Albert Einstein labored unsuccessfully for decades to create a theory that would merge relativity and quantum physics into one tidy mathematical package. But where Einstein failed, physicists may finally be on the verge of success, largely thanks to Edward Witten, generally considered the greatest theoretical physicist in the world. "Ed is unique," says John Schwarz, a theorist at Caltech, "the kind of person who comes along once a century." Yet the greatest theoretical physicist (a string theorist!?!?) has a problem: http://www.sns.ias.edu/~witten/papers/mmm.pdf Ed Witten the Greatest: "But the deeper part of quantum theory is the quantum theory of fields, which arises when one tries to combine quantum mechanics with special relativity (the precursor of general relativity, in which the speed of light is the same in every inertial frame but spacetime is still flat and given ab initio). This much more difficult theory, developed from the late 1920s to the present, encompasses most of what we know of the laws of physics, except gravity." In fact, the problem of Ed Witten the Greatest was solved by Albert Einstein himself in 1907, as two of Ed Witten the Greatest's criminal brothers have discovered: http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.3/smolin.htm Lee Smolin: "Quantum theory was not the only theory that bothered Einstein. Few people have appreciated how dissatisfied he was with his own theories of relativity. Special relativity grew out of Einstein's insight that the laws of electromagnetism cannot depend on relative motion and that the speed of light therefore must be always the same, no matter how the source or the observer moves. Among the consequences of that theory are that energy and mass are equivalent (the now-legendary relationship E = mc2) and that time and distance are relative, not absolute. SPECIAL RELATIVITY WAS THE RESULT OF 10 YEARS OF INTELLECTUAL STRUGGLE, YET EINSTEIN HAD CONVINCED HIMSELF IT WAS WRONG WITHIN TWO YEARS OF PUBLISHING IT." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/OntologyOUP_TimesNR.pdf "What Can We Learn about the Ontology of Space and Time from the Theory of Relativity?", John D. Norton: "In general relativity there is no comparable sense of the constancy of the speed of light. The constancy of the speed of light is a consequence of the perfect homogeneity of spacetime presumed in special relativity. There is a special velocity at each event; homogeneity forces it to be the same velocity everywhere. We lose that homogeneity in the transition to general relativity and with it we lose the constancy of the speed of light. Such was Einstein's conclusion at the earliest moments of his preparation for general relativity. ALREADY IN 1907, A MERE TWO YEARS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY, HE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD." Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<67790915-68eb-440a-8fdd-a577192e3b68@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!8g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a4f122e4-ee05-4f70-ba99-b1a5dff313f5@j28g2000hsj.googlegroups.com> <3652cdf2-4ac1-431a-95c3-4bc0a1a34ac6@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <23d0d5ed-6b16-43f9-9f6d-703e30cf32da@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <e5a38711-e109-4a9c-a7f3-42ddd5e55d99@d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <256595cc-1fb0-4d9e-92a0-2af78d135d8f@h25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,b0f20133accce5e4 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b0f20133accce5e4 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,b0f20133accce5e4 X-Google-Thread: f55d3,b0f20133accce5e4 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,b0f20133accce5e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gidf55d3,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!8g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: NEXT EINSTEINS DEEPLY UNDERSTAND PHYSICS Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 83 Message-ID: <67790915-68eb-440a-8fdd-a577192e3b68@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References: <a4f122e4-ee05-4f70-ba99-b1a5dff313f5@j28g2000hsj.googlegroups.com> <3652cdf2-4ac1-431a-95c3-4bc0a1a34ac6@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <23d0d5ed-6b16-43f9-9f6d-703e30cf32da@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <e5a38711-e109-4a9c-a7f3-42ddd5e55d99@d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <256595cc-1fb0-4d9e-92a0-2af78d135d8f@h25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.161 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206087516 5707 127.0.0.1 (21 Mar 2008 08:18:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.161; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)