🚀 go-pugleaf

"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:373a0db8-6940-41f2-9d04-b7c3ae4e26c3@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> That is, Einsteinians will make two simple modifications in Einstein's
> rotating-disc experiment:
>
> 1. The non-rotating clock (at rest in K) is no longer placed at the
> center of the disc; rather, it is outside the disc but close to the
> rotating periphery where it can be directly compared with passing
> rotating clocks fixed on the periphery.
>
> 2. Einsteinians will increase the diameter of the disc while keeping
> the linear speed of the periphery constant. So clocks fixed on the
> rotating periphery will become virtually inertial.
>
> The two modifications will allow Einsteinians to prove, in accordance
> with Einstein's 1905 light postulate, both:
>
> 1. that rotating clocks run slower than non-rotating clocks.
>
> 2. that non-rotating clocks run slower than rotating clocks.
>
> Finally, Einsteinians will see in the dictionary what REDUCTIO AS
> ABSURDUM means.
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pvalev@yahoo.com
oui mais toi tu confond deux th�o�ries diff�rentes et qui sont la relativit� 
restreinte
et la  tth�orie de la reoativit� g�n�rale  :  ce pour �a que tu ne comprens 
pas.
En relativit� restreinte   c'ets la montre  qui tourne  qui tourne le moins 
vite  puis que
c''es de la relativit� restrentine. alors que dans la th�orie de la 
relativit� g�n�rale
c'est la montre qui est pas acc�l�r�e  celle "du centre" qui tourne pas et 
donc qui tourne la moins vite;
   donc cekla depends de quelle th�orie tu applique.  Ce n'est absourde que 
si tu veux appliqu�e les deux th�ories en m^me
temps   et  ca c'est absurde.....................OK?
Frip.