Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5374SHOULD THE THEORY CORRESPOND TO REALITY?
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:55
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:55
43 lines
3810 bytes
3810 bytes
http://www.friesian.com/penrose.htm Stephen Hawking: "I take the positivist viewpoint that a physical theory is just a mathematical model and that it is meaningless to ask whether it corresponds to reality. All that one can ask is that its predictions should be in agreement with observation." Einstein's theory predicts that the gravitational redshift factor is 1+V/c^2 and the Pound-Rebka experiment does confirm this prediction. Is everything OK? See: http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp "The first confirmation of a long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in 1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated: "In the second place our result shows that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity. One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT FACTOR." Some logical aspects of the problem are discussed here: http://www.wbabin.net/philos/valev9.pdf Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4a9eb800-a873-45b6-9123-42a04b8b7dd6@d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,d060eb9d3946eb8c,start X-Google-Thread: 10b271,d060eb9d3946eb8c,start X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,d060eb9d3946eb8c,start X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,d060eb9d3946eb8c,start X-Google-Thread: f55d3,d060eb9d3946eb8c,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf55d3,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,fr.sci.philo Subject: SHOULD THE THEORY CORRESPOND TO REALITY? Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 43 Message-ID: <4a9eb800-a873-45b6-9123-42a04b8b7dd6@d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.166 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1205254513 31718 127.0.0.1 (11 Mar 2008 16:55:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.166; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)