🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mar 8, 12:27 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 6:47 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 24, 6:39 pm, JanPB <film...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 24, 12:02 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Other signals carefully sent by fat rats:
>
> > > And this means what exactly?
>
> > This means that your criminal masters can no longer sell their dead
> > science in this way:
>
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218
>
> In fact, your criminal masters started leaving the sinking ship a few
> months ago when John Stachel sent the following signal:
>
> http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i6272.html
> John Stachel: "Not only is the theory [of relativity] compatible with
> an emission theory of radiation, since it implies that the velocity of
> light is always the same relative to its source; the theory also
> requires that radiation transfer mass between an emitter and an
> absorber, reinforcing Einstein's light quantum hypothesis that
> radiation manifests a particulate structure under certain
> circumstances."
>
> Even the silliest Einsteinians know that Newton's emission theory of
> light is the main enemy of Divine Albert's relativity so when John
> Stachel says they are compatible this could only mean: "Brothers! We
> are on the wrong ship! Einstein's 1905 light postulate is false!"

http://discovermagazine.com/2008/mar/10-einstein-didn.t-grok-his-own-revolution
"Albert Einstein--creator of relativity, godfather of quantum physics,
bender of space and time--had a little problem that dogged him all his
career: LACK OF VISION......Einstein changed his mind so many times on
so many subjects," Rovelli says. "That's a sign of a great scientist.
A GREAT SCIENTIST IS NOT SOMEBODY WHO BELIEVES HIS OWN IDEAS; IT'S
SOMEBODY WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE HIS OWN IDEAS. HE'S READY TO CHANGE HIS
MIND."

First of all, Einstein did have a vision:

Albert Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by
the speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf/files/975547d7-2d00-433a-b7e3-4a09145525ca.pdf
Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot
be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures.
Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the
theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary
physics."

Second, all relatively clever Einsteinians have already changed their
minds and abandoned the sinking ship but it takes a naive Einsteinian
to express this explicitly:

http://ustl1.univ-lille1.fr/culture/publication/lna/detail/lna40/pgs/4_5.pdf
Jean Eisenstaedt: "Il n'y a alors aucune raison théorique à ce que la
vitesse de la lumière ne dépende pas de la vitesse de sa source ainsi
que de celle de l'observateur terrestre ; plus clairement encore, il
n'y a pas de raison, dans le cadre de la logique des Principia de
Newton, pour que la lumière se comporte autrement - quant à sa
trajectoire - qu'une particule matérielle. Il n'y a pas non plus de
raison pour que la lumière ne soit pas sensible à la gravitation.
Bref, pourquoi ne pas appliquer à la lumière toute la théorie
newtonienne ? C'est en fait ce que font plusieurs astronomes,
opticiens, philosophes de la nature à la fin du XVIIIème siècle. Les
résultats sont étonnants... et aujourd'hui nouveaux."

Translation from French: "Therefore there is no theoretical reason why
the speed of light should not depend on the speed of the source and
the speed of the terrestrial observer as well; even more clearly,
there is no reason, in the framework of the logic of Newton's
Principia, why light should behave, as far as its trajectory is
concerned, differently from a material particle. Neither is there any
reason why light should not be sensible to gravitation. Briefly, why
don't we apply the whole Newtonian theory to light? In fact, that is
what many astronomers, opticians, philosophers of nature did by the
end of 18th century. The results are surprising....and new nowadays."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com