Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5393Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
From: HW Henri Wilson
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:07
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:07
34 lines
2706 bytes
2706 bytes
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:42:15 -0500, "R. Josh iii" <rjosh3@wanadoo.fr> wrote: >Pentcho Valev wrote: > >> Oui mon cher R. Josh 3-(2+1) le Disciple, nous les obscurantistes et >> les simplificateurs gagnerons! Et *nous* *brulerons* *tous* *les* *livres* ou >> tes Maitres Lumineux considerent la contraction des longueurs ou bien >> comme un effet reel ou bien comme un effet de perspective spatio- >> temporelle: > >*Aveu* du Peine-Chaud Valet Obscurantiste et Simplificateur qu'il est un >*destructeur* de *livres* !!! > >C'est le pire des crimes contre la culture et la civilisation. > >Pentcho the Barbarian ! Leave Pencho alone! There is a very simple explanation. The pole never fits inside the barn. Length contraction never occurs. Einstein's theory is plain nonsense from start to finish. > >RJ Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm Einstein's Relativity is easy to understand if one has the IQ of a parrot and a gullibility index >0.95.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<rs66t355p58umcgha5101j83t000a6sia3@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<4caf8a21-acd0-42de-a040-842dcad0e000@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <47ce8f64$0$901$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <3bcdf823-df01-46c6-a537-c2ab4947bad6@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <47ced516$0$847$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <155454cf-7590-4ef7-b826-fcc0795313c4@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <c5953642-2808-4ce4-8720-f6275aaf7c2e@x30g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <47d03ae9$0$905$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf74ae,public,usenet X-Google-Language: FRENCH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,sci.astro Subject: Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION Reply-To: HW@....... Message-ID: <rs66t355p58umcgha5101j83t000a6sia3@4ax.com> References: <4caf8a21-acd0-42de-a040-842dcad0e000@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <47ce8f64$0$901$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <3bcdf823-df01-46c6-a537-c2ab4947bad6@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <47ced516$0$847$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <155454cf-7590-4ef7-b826-fcc0795313c4@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <c5953642-2808-4ce4-8720-f6275aaf7c2e@x30g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <47d03ae9$0$905$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 34 Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:07:11 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.165.171.39 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1205017631 58.165.171.39 (Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:07:11 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:07:11 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services