Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5405Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION
From: Denis Feldmann
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:17
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:17
45 lines
2991 bytes
2991 bytes
Sue... a �crit : > On Mar 6, 3:31 pm, Denis Feldmann <feldmann.denis.asuppri...@neuf.fr> > wrote: >> Rudolf Drabek a �crit : >> >> >> >>> I'm not good in understanding SR. >>> I only want to know if I look to the situation from the pole's frame: >>> So the distance between the barn doors is in any case too short, that >>> the pole can fit into the barn. >>> SR is symmetrical for time dilatation and length contraction, but not >>> for this situation. >>> Who can help me out. >> Easy: the whole scenario insist on *simultaneously closing the doors*, >> and > > << simultaneity is not an absolute concept, >> > > Gosh! I guess the U.S. Navy just got lucky bringing > down that faulty spy satellite. No : it just happened they had only one referential in which to do it. Of course, from the satellite point of view, it may have been a failure... In fact, I have > a lot of timing delays in my computer I think I > remove if they don't do anything. :o) Unless your cpmputrer is physically running (fast) in circles in your room (in which case I strongly suggest you change it, or at least move one of you out of the building), it is no fault of SR > > Sue... > > > >> so there is no >> contradiction. But, of course, any serious student of SR knows that, or >> can redemonstrate it to him(her)self convincingly, so you will only find >> crank answers here... >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<fqpn0h$3j7$1@netfinity.fr>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!news.netfinity.fr!netfinity.fr!not-for-mailReferences:
<4caf8a21-acd0-42de-a040-842dcad0e000@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <c40a0034-d54c-4d9f-91af-7117209af32a@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <fqpka6$34o$1@netfinity.fr> <6becbd93-47df-4e14-9ce6-75aed4c953ee@y77g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,77eb89d693e39266 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf74ae,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.71.11 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!news.netfinity.fr!netfinity.fr!not-for-mail From: Denis Feldmann <feldmann.denis.asupprimer@neuf.fr> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,sci.astro Subject: Re: THE BEST EXPLANATION OF LENGTH CONTRACTION Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:17:09 +0100 Organization: Netfinity NNTP Server Lines: 45 Message-ID: <fqpn0h$3j7$1@netfinity.fr> References: <4caf8a21-acd0-42de-a040-842dcad0e000@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <c40a0034-d54c-4d9f-91af-7117209af32a@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <fqpka6$34o$1@netfinity.fr> <6becbd93-47df-4e14-9ce6-75aed4c953ee@y77g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: netfinity.fr V7PT026Wnnzo8PjruveKau3h/l6DHSwVFhn9Dehmi9Q= X-Complaints-To: abuse@netfinity.fr In-Reply-To: <6becbd93-47df-4e14-9ce6-75aed4c953ee@y77g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080306-1, 06/03/2008), Outbound message User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)