Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5412Re: DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS IN NATURAL SCIENCES
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:13
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:13
32 lines
2948 bytes
2948 bytes
On Mar 7, 5:37 pm, philippus <philipp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Une science honnête ne serait-ce pas la conscience ? > Science sans conscience n'est que ruine de l'âme. > Philippus > > On 19 fév, 16:28, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Those interested in the logical aspects of science may wish to see > > this: > > > http://www.wbabin.net/philos/valev9.pdf Une conscience effective presuppose un esprit qui n'est pas traite par Big Brother; ce n'est pas toujours le cas: http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/ George Orwell "1984": "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?" Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<938b9b73-adce-4dbf-bfe6-69bdd42962fc@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!8g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<814d0dd7-3cd7-4768-bdfa-492dc5282aa7@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <6b9b8f29-677c-4078-a902-339f6969c928@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,f89088ed82c1f3c4 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,f89088ed82c1f3c4 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,f89088ed82c1f3c4 X-Google-Thread: f55d3,f89088ed82c1f3c4 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,f89088ed82c1f3c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gidf55d3,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!8g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS IN NATURAL SCIENCES Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 08:13:48 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 32 Message-ID: <938b9b73-adce-4dbf-bfe6-69bdd42962fc@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References: <814d0dd7-3cd7-4768-bdfa-492dc5282aa7@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <6b9b8f29-677c-4078-a902-339f6969c928@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.163 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1204906432 28798 127.0.0.1 (7 Mar 2008 16:13:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.163; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)