🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mar 1, 7:49 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
> "xxein" <xx...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:1584838d-0503-436d-bab2-7cd988511498@c33g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 1, 2:51 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Astronomy/Cosmology/...
> > The Life of the Cosmos
> > Lee Smolin
> > "Lee Smolin offers a new theory of the universe that is at once
> > elegant, comprehensive, and radically different from anything proposed
> > before....Natural selection may guide the appearance of the laws of
> > physics, favoring those universes which best reproduce.....Offers an
> > intriguing blend of the ideas of Einstein and Darwin. Argues that the
> > laws of nature may themselves be subject to natural selection."
>
> > In fact, Lee Smolin has initially discovered that Einstein's idiotic
> > "law of nature" according to which the speed of light is constant does
> > not allow Einstein zombie world to reproduce successfully anymore:
>
> >http://edge.org/3rd_culture/smolin03/smolin03_index.html
> > Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the
> > effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of
> > the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory
> > that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the
> > same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the
> > sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself
> > based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy
> > of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized
> > Einstein's general theory of relativity. Because Einstein's special
> > theory is only a kind of approximation to his general theory, we can
> > implement the principles of the latter but find modifications to the
> > former. And this is what seems to be happening! So Gambini, Pullin,
> > and others calculated how light travels in a quantum geometry and
> > found that the theory predicts that the speed of light has a small
> > dependence on energy. Photons of higher energy travel slightly slower
> > than low-energy photons....A very exciting question we are now
> > wrestling with is, How drastically shall we be forced to modify
> > Einstein's special theory of relativity if the predicted effect is
> > observed? The most severe possibility is that the principle of
> > relativity simply fails....But there is another possibility. This is
> > that the principle of relativity is preserved, but Einstein's special
> > theory of relativity requires modification so as to allow photons to
> > have a speed that depends on energy. The most shocking thing I have
> > learned in the last year is that this is a real possibility. A photon
> > can have an energy-dependent speed without violating the principle of
> > relativity!"
>
> > Fortunately, Smolin has also discovered that Einstein's 1905 false
> > light postulate, like any other law of nature, is subject to natural
> > selection. So a new species called "Einstein zombie world with
> > variable speed of light" will emerge soon and this new species will
> > reproduce so well that, in the struggle for survival, all other
> > species will disappear forever.
>
> > Pentcho Valev
> > pva...@yahoo.com
>
> | xxein:  Smolin did it wrongly and came to wrong conclusions as a
> | victim of what he doesn't properly understand of the physic.  Anyone
> | and everyone does this.
>
> xxein did it wrongly and came to wrong conclusions as a
> victim of what he doesn't properly understand of mathematics.
> Geez you stupid shit.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

xxein:  I can twist mathematics to choke you to death, but I can't
reach you physically.

What does that say about the meaning of math?