🚀 go-pugleaf

On Feb 24, 8:09 pm, "Josef Matz" <josefm...@arcor.de> wrote:
> Correct fully Pentcho.
>
> Its clear that only one - if at all - runs slow. Clocks always go unique
> even if they run different.
> SR is unclear in that point. A problem that can be fixed and should be fixed
> soon.
>
> Josef

Who knows. Problems are not fixed in Einstein zombie world. Rather,
profiteers camouflage them initially and then just abandon the whole
field as soon as some new money-spinner gets available:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/
Jos Uffink: "In the eyes of many modern physicists, the theory has
acquired a somewhat dubious status. They regard classical
thermodynamics as a relic from a bygone era... Indeed, the view that
thermodynamics is obsolete is so common that many physicists use the
phrase 'Second Law of Thermodynamics' to denote some counterpart of
this law in the kinetic theory of gases or in statistical mechanics."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

>
> "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitragnews:373a0db8-6940-41f2-9d04-b7c3ae4e26c3@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > That is, Einsteinians will make two simple modifications in Einstein's
> > rotating-disc experiment:
>
> > 1. The non-rotating clock (at rest in K) is no longer placed at the
> > center of the disc; rather, it is outside the disc but close to the
> > rotating periphery where it can be directly compared with passing
> > rotating clocks fixed on the periphery.
>
> > 2. Einsteinians will increase the diameter of the disc while keeping
> > the linear speed of the periphery constant. So clocks fixed on the
> > rotating periphery will become virtually inertial.
>
> > The two modifications will allow Einsteinians to prove, in accordance
> > with Einstein's 1905 light postulate, both:
>
> > 1. that rotating clocks run slower than non-rotating clocks.
>
> > 2. that non-rotating clocks run slower than rotating clocks.
>
> > Finally, Einsteinians will see in the dictionary what REDUCTIO AD
> > ABSURDUM means.