🚀 go-pugleaf

Who knows Pentcho.

Einstein himself told that if his theories are wrong there is nothing like a
possible field theory.
In fact then we too are out of chance to gain a 100% logic base.
What i dont like at the present situation is, that discussions in moderated
groups are not possible
if you get the terminus superluminal somewhere in. Its filtered out,
censored.
At this stage when a critical discussion is forbidden in moderated groups i
am very glad to have presented my ideas at least in this group.

So i see a small chance for getting a SR model that is not selfcontradicting
and containing gravity and
cosmology.

So i think that everywhere is space at absolute rest. This defined by the
isotropy of cosmic background radiation or of far distant matter like
istropy of the Hubble movment or similar.
Everything having a velocity with respect to this has clocks running slow
than cosmic time which in my model is everywhere the same.

So my idea is that everywhere is a preferred frame at rest. I dont think
that the idea of an preferred frame is new.

Now i hope we can find an answer here in future, because this interests me
too now.


What you say about profiters and the way things go you are probably not the
only who thinks this way.
Things sometime run really crazy. All what  is done is just keeping the
fatal results in tolarable limits.
Now there was always discussions on Relativity and if the establishment isnt
willing things must be
changed from outside. Better insight the only way and this only can be
achieved by discussion.

Josef



"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:ab5a7ad0-c362-44a8-8afb-f8fedfc33381@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 24, 8:09 pm, "Josef Matz" <josefm...@arcor.de> wrote:
> Correct fully Pentcho.
>
> Its clear that only one - if at all - runs slow. Clocks always go unique
> even if they run different.
> SR is unclear in that point. A problem that can be fixed and should be
fixed
> soon.
>
> Josef

Who knows. Problems are not fixed in Einstein zombie world. Rather,
profiteers camouflage them initially and then just abandon the whole
field as soon as some new money-spinner gets available:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/
Jos Uffink: "In the eyes of many modern physicists, the theory has
acquired a somewhat dubious status. They regard classical
thermodynamics as a relic from a bygone era... Indeed, the view that
thermodynamics is obsolete is so common that many physicists use the
phrase 'Second Law of Thermodynamics' to denote some counterpart of
this law in the kinetic theory of gases or in statistical mechanics."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

>
> "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> schrieb im
Newsbeitragnews:373a0db8-6940-41f2-9d04-b7c3ae4e26c3@n77g2000hse.googlegroup
s.com...
>
>
>
> > That is, Einsteinians will make two simple modifications in Einstein's
> > rotating-disc experiment:
>
> > 1. The non-rotating clock (at rest in K) is no longer placed at the
> > center of the disc; rather, it is outside the disc but close to the
> > rotating periphery where it can be directly compared with passing
> > rotating clocks fixed on the periphery.
>
> > 2. Einsteinians will increase the diameter of the disc while keeping
> > the linear speed of the periphery constant. So clocks fixed on the
> > rotating periphery will become virtually inertial.
>
> > The two modifications will allow Einsteinians to prove, in accordance
> > with Einstein's 1905 light postulate, both:
>
> > 1. that rotating clocks run slower than non-rotating clocks.
>
> > 2. that non-rotating clocks run slower than rotating clocks.
>
> > Finally, Einsteinians will see in the dictionary what REDUCTIO AD
> > ABSURDUM means.