🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 29, 12:23 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 29, 11:40 am,PentchoValev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 29, 9:13 am,PentchoValev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 27, 12:10 pm,PentchoValev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 26, 4:19 pm,PentchoValev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > String theorists: definitely the silliest Einsteinians:
>
> > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzMEAkI-yrQ&feature=related
>
> > > > Compare with this:
>
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w
>
> > > String theorists: silly but expensive Einsteinians:
>
> > > http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/01/physics-prof-pr.html
> > > "Physics Prof Proposes String Theory Test (But It'll Cost Us). The
> > > apparent inability of physics' string theory to be proved right or
> > > wrong is one of the stickiest - and argument-generating - problems in
> > > modern science. But now researchers at the University of Illinois say
> > > they might have a way to test some of string theory's predictions.
> > > Only problem? It'll be very, very expense. String theory is probably
> > > the most well-fleshed out candidate today for a so-called Theory of
> > > Everything. That means that it would integrate virtually everything we
> > > know about physics thus far, including the microscopic observations of
> > > the sub-atomic world and events that happen on a galaxy-wide scale,
> > > and follow the rules of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity."
>
> > Amazingly, string theorists believe that quantum gravity theorists are
> > the silliest Einsteinians:
>
> > http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/06/lee-smolin-vs-thibault-damour.html
> > Motl: "Damour has argued that not even Smolin can be so limited that
> > he would actually believe the naive Popperian dogmas. Well, I am
> > afraid that Smolin is much more stupid than Damour can even imagine.
> > Accepting statements of philosophers as dogmas, blowing them out of
> > proportion, applying them behind the range of their validity
> > regardless of physical arguments, and using them to organize witch
> > hunts is something that Lee Smolin is very good at."
>
> > Those who know French could easily see that quantum gravity theorist
> > Lee Smolin is silly indeed but string theorist Thibault Damour is much
> > sillier:
>
> > http://www.cite-sciences.fr/francais/ala_cite/college/v2/html/2006_2007/conferences/conference_342.htm
>
> Note how desperately silly Smolin asks sillier Damour what would
> happen if the speed of photons is not constant. Sillier Damour
> believes there is nothing to worry about: after all, string theory
> presupposes a lot of Lorentz violations. Bold Damour is going to go
> beyond Einstein - he wants to have constants that vary.

Silly Smolin wants to revolutionize the concept of time but sillier
Damour believes that Divine Albert has revolutionized it enough. On
the other hand, sillier Damour believes in Lorentz violations and
constants that vary. Yes, string theorists are definitely the silliest
members of Einstein criminal cult.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com