🚀 go-pugleaf

"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:Rhxhj.5953$Z61.5102@trnddc07...
| "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> doctored  in message
| news:p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com...
| < http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53d76c65c83ec84a >
| 'EMPTY' space has NO dielectric properties. [1]
| If one tries to measure same, one merely measures the
| properties of one's own apparatus....and probably gets 'c'.
| Henri Wilson. ASTC, BSc,DSc(T)
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
| >
| >
| [hanson]
| ... ahahaha.. What do you mean by "probably"?
| Probe ever so kosher Osher Doctorow for a
| a numerical probability value of your notion.
| >
| Here we do have a great opportunity to see
| what kosher P-value Osher has with his *PI*,
| Osher's Precious Intellect, after he answers it,
| or whether Osher only recites items he plucked
| out old high school Text books and re-pastes
| them here on the Usenet... ahahaha.....
| >
| Henry, your [1] assertion is purely a matter of
| definition what space is supposed to represent...
| Therefore... (you carry on from here, Henry)...
| Thanks for the laughs... hahahahahahahanson
|
Henry is the next Einstein -- full of shit and self-importance.
If anyone ever had delusions of grandeur it is "Doctor" Wilson,
 BASIC programmer, house builder, car mechanic and lab boy
that can't count.
  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SagDoppler.gif
  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/WilsonTickFairy.gif
He has some trouble with 'nu' and 'v', too. In his training for his
doctorate from the Outback the ozzies forgot to teach him the
Greek alphabet.

"When Einstein deviously rendered the aether redundant (although still a
reality)" -- Wilson the crank aetherialist.
 news:pvetm3l83u901a5uljn7490fisjm2tjtfb@4ax.com.

"DON'T TRY TO USE ROTATING FRAMES." -- Wilson (who can't manage it).
   news:aqqqm35ka2ef6qheidr8b1qh2bi0tv1bgo@4ax.com


"A rotating frame is not a 'rotating frame'...
hahahahhahahahaha!" --Wilson
  news:mu2nm3d6urgddt8jgdnss0ddualtsrnm7n@4ax.com

"There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
   http://tinyurl.com/2rk695

"In BaTh there is NO DOPPLER SHIFT AT THE OBSERVER" -- Wilson
  news:uemrk39d4o3dka3tukbb68dtiaeu7oamm1@4ax.com

"There is NO WAVELENGTH SHIFT at the observer."
  news:ctb7l3lhh3vmq9b0sip2vt546ggrqrctab@4ax.com

"Light doesn't have a 'frequency'. It has a wavelength." --Wilson.
 news:1193906355.448067.162590@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com

"SPINNING OBJECTS HAVE A FREQUENCY, NOT A BLOODY WAVELENGTH." -- Wilson
  news:pllli3puamdqd70qnenjoonfsbjtv1ibmj@4ax.com

"Light doesn't have a particuar 'frequency' in the normal sense.
 Frequency is the inferred rate at whichABSOLUTE wavecrests leave the
source" -- Wilson.
 news:3ghfh3h30n795o2vs1sulouge37ve0n17i@4ax.com

"THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT IN GENERAL, THE 'WAVELENGTH' OF AN OSCILLATION  IS 
THE
SAME IN ALL FRAMES." -- Wilson
  news:920ni31ul6rb833qrltro49t3pnv2g5qk5@4ax.com

"Anyway, this now fits in perfectly with my 'intrinsic oscillation
frequency' idea.
Thankyou Jerry for helping me develop my theory...." -- Wilson,
 October 26, 2007 1:03 PM
  news:iml3i3dh0vmisp6ln34ron41uoljmonvni@4ax.com

"That's the kind of argument I'd expect from a desperate
person....completely out of ideas... ahahahaha!" -- Wilson.

"For one ray, ct = 2piR+vt , for the other ct = 2piR-vt. This gives t =
2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v)" -- Wilson.
 news:q21vi3lmjhp5s9pkc554egjp1taus1drbt@4ax.com...
"That's for the nonrotating frame, dopey." -- Wilson.
news:cp7vi35bvqvta6o1vcvi4m1v6q8t4ro1la@4ax.com.

"There is NOT the same number of wavelengths between the STARTPOINT and
the detector" -- Wilson
 news:8no1j39qhu9tk2nqglqkgt00u07se4i63q@4ax.com