🚀 go-pugleaf

"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message 
news:OWyhj.18862$9e1.4106@trnddc02...
| ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.. Andro, with your extarordinarily quick,
| fast and convincing accolades for Dr, Wilson...  in your
| news:Q9yhj.107666$036.70690@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| ,  you have **shielded**  not only Henry, but also and even more
| so, you have taken away any chance for Osher Doctorow to
| respond kosherly...  Wait until they have had their say and then
| bless'em accordingly. So, here are the requests to them again:
| >
| "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> doctored  in message
| news:p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com...
| < http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53d76c65c83ec84a >
| 'EMPTY' space has NO dielectric properties. [1]
| If one tries to measure same, one merely measures the
| properties of one's own apparatus....and probably gets 'c'.
| Henri Wilson. ASTC, BSc,DSc(T)
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
| >
| [hanson]
| ... ahahaha.. What do you mean by "probably"?
| Probe ever so kosher Osher Doctorow for a
| a numerical probability value of your notion.
| >
| Here we do have a great opportunity to see
| what kosher P-value Osher has with his *PI*,
| Osher's Precious Intellect, after he answers it,
| or whether Osher only recites items he plucked
| out old high school Text books and re-pastes
| them here on the Usenet... ahahaha.....
| >
| Henry, your [1] assertion is purely a matter of
| definition what space is supposed to represent...
| Therefore... (you carry on from here, Henry)...
| Thanks for the laughs... hahahahahahahanson
|
|
Yeah, well, ya gotta understand... Dr. Wilson  will
repeat what I said some months later and then claim
he thought of it.
What it boils down to is "Nothing" has no properties.
Whilst matter has properties, extrapolation to nothing
is meaningless.  What's the speed of sound in a vacuum?
Dumb question, there is no sound in a vacuum, but
there is a speed of sound in a rarefied gas.
The permittivity and permeability of "free space"
are properties of aether, aether was dismissed but its
properties retained and it was given a new name.
If that ain't funny then what is?

Dr. Wilson's  "probably"  is actually a certainty.  Anyone
wanting to claim an equation in the form c = 1/sqrt(x*y)
will invent an x value and a y value to get the answer they
want, the value will be so close to zero it cannot be checked.