🚀 go-pugleaf

"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message news:iUMhj.9$Y63.4@trnddc03...
| "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> doctored  in message
| news:p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com...
| < http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53d76c65c83ec84a >
| and now in news:crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com...
| 'EMPTY' space has NO dielectric properties. [1]
| If one tries to measure same, one merely measures the
| properties of one's own apparatus....and probably gets 'c'.
| Henri Wilson. ASTC, BSc,DSc(T)
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
| >
| [hanson]
| [2] ... ahahaha.. What do you mean by "probably"?
| Probe ever so kosher Osher Doctorow for a
| a numerical probability value of your notion.
| >
| [3] Here we do have a great opportunity to see
| what kosher P-value Osher has with his *PI*,
| Osher's Precious Intellect, after he answers it,
| or whether Osher only recites items he plucked
| out old high school Text books and re-pastes
| them here on the Usenet... ahahaha.....
| >
| Henri, your [1] assertion is purely a matter of
| definition what space is supposed to represent...
| Therefore... (you carry on from here, Henri)... [4]
| Thanks for the laughs... hahahahahahahanson
| >
| [Henri]
| "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) wrote
| You know that Androcles was employed for forty years as one
| of those people who changes street light bulbs for the local council.
| During wekends, he used to remove the wiring from wrecked
| cars and sell the copper. He firmly believes that this makes
| him a radio engineer and an expert in physics.
| >
| [hanson]
| .... ahahahaha... But Henri,  justified or not, if your emotional tirade
| above, against Andro, is a continuation of [4] then that is fully
| equivalent to anagrams one can produce with "Dr. Henri Wilson" =
| a "Swindler Rhino" who does "howl: *Dinner, Sir*' " in the fabled
| "Rider's Howl Inn" over the "Worn Dish Liner"... ahahaha...
| >
| [Henri]
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
| [5] Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating
| frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating
| frame.  Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?
| >
| [hanson]
| AHAHAHA.. but Henri, you do not address my inquiry [1] and [4].
| Forget... [5], the belief of relativists, Sagnac and imaginary effects.
| Just enlighten me, in simple words, on my inquiry [1] and [4].
| 
| ... and don't wait for Osher. He is still weighing the probabilities.
| ahahaha... ahahahanson

"DON'T TRY TO USE ROTATING FRAMES." -- Wilson (who can't manage it).
   news:aqqqm35ka2ef6qheidr8b1qh2bi0tv1bgo@4ax.com


"A rotating frame is not a 'rotating frame'...
hahahahhahahahaha!" --Wilson
  news:mu2nm3d6urgddt8jgdnss0ddualtsrnm7n@4ax.com