🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:39:16 GMT, "Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_d>
wrote:

>
>"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message news:iUMhj.9$Y63.4@trnddc03...
>| "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> doctored  in message
>| news:p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com...
>| < http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53d76c65c83ec84a >
>| and now in news:crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com...
>| 'EMPTY' space has NO dielectric properties. [1]
>| If one tries to measure same, one merely measures the
>| properties of one's own apparatus....and probably gets 'c'.
>| Henri Wilson. ASTC, BSc,DSc(T)
>| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>| >
>| [hanson]
>| [2] ... ahahaha.. What do you mean by "probably"?
>| Probe ever so kosher Osher Doctorow for a
>| a numerical probability value of your notion.
>| >
>| [3] Here we do have a great opportunity to see
>| what kosher P-value Osher has with his *PI*,
>| Osher's Precious Intellect, after he answers it,
>| or whether Osher only recites items he plucked
>| out old high school Text books and re-pastes
>| them here on the Usenet... ahahaha.....
>| >
>| Henri, your [1] assertion is purely a matter of
>| definition what space is supposed to represent...
>| Therefore... (you carry on from here, Henri)... [4]
>| Thanks for the laughs... hahahahahahahanson
>| >
>| [Henri]
>| "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) wrote
>| You know that Androcles was employed for forty years as one
>| of those people who changes street light bulbs for the local council.
>| During wekends, he used to remove the wiring from wrecked
>| cars and sell the copper. He firmly believes that this makes
>| him a radio engineer and an expert in physics.
>| >
>| [hanson]
>| .... ahahahaha... But Henri,  justified or not, if your emotional tirade
>| above, against Andro, is a continuation of [4] then that is fully
>| equivalent to anagrams one can produce with "Dr. Henri Wilson" =
>| a "Swindler Rhino" who does "howl: *Dinner, Sir*' " in the fabled
>| "Rider's Howl Inn" over the "Worn Dish Liner"... ahahaha...
>| >
>| [Henri]
>| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>| [5] Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating
>| frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating
>| frame.  Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?
>| >
>| [hanson]
>| AHAHAHA.. but Henri, you do not address my inquiry [1] and [4].
>| Forget... [5], the belief of relativists, Sagnac and imaginary effects.
>| Just enlighten me, in simple words, on my inquiry [1] and [4].
>| 
>| ... and don't wait for Osher. He is still weighing the probabilities.
>| ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
>"DON'T TRY TO USE ROTATING FRAMES." -- Wilson (who can't manage it).
>   news:aqqqm35ka2ef6qheidr8b1qh2bi0tv1bgo@4ax.com
>
>
>"A rotating frame is not a 'rotating frame'...
>hahahahhahahahaha!" --Wilson
>  news:mu2nm3d6urgddt8jgdnss0ddualtsrnm7n@4ax.com

Note folks: This is what professional jealousy does to a man....


Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating frame. Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?