🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5894

Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY

#5894
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:31
52 lines
4823 bytes
On Jan 6, 21:56, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
> John Kennaugh wrote:
> >Tom Roberts wrote:
> >> The key property of all fundamental theories of modern physics is
> >> Lorentz invariance. So that is what had better be compatible with some
> >> alternative theory, or its proponents must re-create all of modern
> >> physics.
>
> > If Ballistic theory is correct SR is based on an incorrect premise and
> > all that the Lorentz transforms do is transform a theory based upon an
> > incorrect premise in such a way to give the same answer as the correct
> > theory. Rather like basing the maths on the assumption that the earth is
> > the centre of the solar system - you can make the maths work it is
> > simply that they are more complicated than necessary and it is difficult
> > to ascribe physical interpretation to them - as with SR.
>
> > You are not talking about a minor tweak to theory but an entirely
> > different way of looking at things. There is no requirement that it has
> > to incorporate any of the mathematical baggage associated with
> > relativity it only has to be consistent with experimental results.
>
> Right. You're saying just what I said above, using more words.
>
> > As Waldron says "It must be borne in mind that it is facts that a theory
> > must explain, not inferences from those facts on the basis of another
> > theory".
>
> Right. There are literally ZILLIONS of facts that we explain using SR.
> Some putative new ballistic theory must come up with a method to explain
> them, too.

The "putative new ballistic theory" will fail Roberts Roberts. Only
special relativity is able to explain how Einsteinians can trap a long
train inside a short tunnel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSRIyDfo_mY&mode=related&search=

and also a 80m long pole inside a 40m long barn:

http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/barn_pole.html
"These are the props. You own a barn, 40m long, with automatic doors
at either end, that can be opened and closed simultaneously by a
switch. You also have a pole, 80m long, which of course won't fit in
the barn....So, as the pole passes through the barn, there is an
instant when it is completely within the barn. At that instant, you
close both doors simultaneously, with your switch. Of course, you open
them again pretty quickly, but at least momentarily you had the
contracted pole shut up in your barn."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8ed0ead5-50b6-42de-8f77-673f47f36627@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <a59fe998-d3d5-41d7-9f97-7c28eb6bb919@w34g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1197982173_6087@sicinfo3.epfl.ch> <XBKHYEUW4DaHFwEB@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <1198054703_29@sicinfo3.epfl.ch> <eb1e230f-e44b-4b79-b826-2c31ac0fd045@18g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <2VePdNFGLTaHFwhi@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <13mja0721544773@corp.supernews.com> <LhNAg9CKKmaHFwVV@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <oDwaj.31038$lD6.2744@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <xrouyIGf99aHFwDR@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <dbCbj.59107$eY.10537@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net> <HcPTPBMdpodHFwv0@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <VZydj.27486$4V6.7380@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net> <QL1mq7J6gOeHFw1E@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <50cej.2303$pr6.1865@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> <ycce$pCn2LgHFwRC@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <wnagj.2633$jJ5.1932@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,128cc9ce0b836800
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,128cc9ce0b836800
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,128cc9ce0b836800
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,128cc9ce0b836800
X-Google-Thread: f55d3,c8a8c8fa96d6fb1c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf55d3,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, fr.sci.physique, 
 fr.sci.maths, fr.sci.philo
Subject: Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:31:40 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <8ed0ead5-50b6-42de-8f77-673f47f36627@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <a59fe998-d3d5-41d7-9f97-7c28eb6bb919@w34g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> 
 <1197982173_6087@sicinfo3.epfl.ch> <XBKHYEUW4DaHFwEB@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk>
 <1198054703_29@sicinfo3.epfl.ch> <eb1e230f-e44b-4b79-b826-2c31ac0fd045@18g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <2VePdNFGLTaHFwhi@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <13mja0721544773@corp.supernews.com>
 <LhNAg9CKKmaHFwVV@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <oDwaj.31038$lD6.2744@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
 <xrouyIGf99aHFwDR@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <dbCbj.59107$eY.10537@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>
 <HcPTPBMdpodHFwv0@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <VZydj.27486$4V6.7380@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net>
 <QL1mq7J6gOeHFw1E@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <50cej.2303$pr6.1865@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>
 <ycce$pCn2LgHFwRC@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <wnagj.2633$jJ5.1932@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.159
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1199691101 31096 127.0.0.1 (7 Jan 2008 07:31:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:31:41 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.159; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET 
 CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)