🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 1, 1:32 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 31 2007, 18:41, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote
> in sci.physics.relativity:
>
> > SR explains and describes the Sagnac effect without light traveling at
> > any speed other than c in vacuum, RELATIVE TO ANY INERTIAL FRAME. The
> > standard ballistic/emission theory, in which light travels with speed
> > c+v where v is the velocity of the source (relative to an inertial
> > frame), obtain the wrong answer for Sagnac (this theory predicts a null
> > result, but the experiment obtains a non-null result).
>
> Whoever told you the emission theory predicts a null result Roberts
> Roberts? Superior brothers did not tell you anything - I am sure about
> that. Superior brothers do not discuss Sagnac at all - haven't you
> noticed that Roberts Roberts? Superior brothers are obviously cleverer
> than you. Anyway, note that the emission theory would predict a null
> result only if the real path of both c-v and c+v photons is a circular
> loop. But that is not the case Roberts Roberts. The real path of the
> photons is always a POLYGON INSCRIBED IN THE ROTATING CIRCULAR LOOP,
> and only you should make the necessary calculations. Because only you
> and a few bellicose zombies claim the Sagnac experiment refutes the
> emission theory. Nobody else does Roberts Roberts.
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

Distributed theory which is not compatible with theory of relativity
claims:

Redistributed balance in momentum and gravitational dimension
= weight, simply put redistributed balance = weight. Note 're',
meaning
second distribution in the second dimension.

Light has no redistribution, therefore it travels without weight.

Einstein's theory claims there is nothing in the vacuum of space
and all things contract relativistically.

Light is electro-magnetic waves that distribute but do not
redistribute.

Distribution is spreading, a science contra and not necessarily
compatible with theory of relativity.