🚀 go-pugleaf

"Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message 
news:sL8cj.111040$cJ3.101468@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Chris" <anonymous@noserver.com> wrote in message
> news:SO6cj.40932$S37.25886@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> :I don't think he was wrong, just misunderstood and I don't understand it
> : either.
> :
> : The lorenz transform is symmentrical
>
> Ok, that is why you don't understand it.

You think it isn't symmetrical?  That the LT is its own inverse?

> What you have NOT
> done is examined how the "Lorentz Transformations" (which I call
> the cuckoo malformations)

Which, as you are a prime example of a cuckoo, means nothing.

> came into non-existence.
> The mathematics is in section 3 of
> "On The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" by Albert Crazy Einstein,
> and I've explained it here:
>  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm

Your silly animation does NOT show what AE's definition means at all.  He 
says that in a given single frame of reference, in which A and B are at 
rest, the time taken for light to go from A to B is the same as B to A, and 
that if their clocks show this, then their clocks are in sync (and vice 
versa).

You say "Gee, I hope I didn't make any errors, I so much want to understand 
relativity."

That, of course, is a lie.  You don't want to understand.  You want Einstein 
(and a century's worth of physicists) to be wrong and so you deliberately 
misunderstand to make it so.  Just so you can feed your own ego.  Sad.