🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5935

Re: I am confused by relativity

#5935
From: BURT
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 23:46
79 lines
5028 bytes
On Dec 24, 10:38 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2:52 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
> SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in sci.physics.relativity:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Abonito" <anonym...@noserver.com> wrote:
> > > Relativity Geometry
> > > Relativity - Affine Geometry ?
> > > Einstein's special theory of relativity is about measurements between frames
> > > of reference in a state of non acceleration.
>
> > Not really. Special relativity can work with accelerated
> > objects and frames, but never mind.
>
> > > It is an observation that the
> > > velocity of light is independent of the relative velocity between observer
> > > and the source. From this Lorenz postulated a length contraction to allow
> > > for this. Einstein derived the same equation from the observations.
> > > If you look at this equation there is no special frame so any frame may be
> > > taken as the reference frame.
> > > Let us consider the passage of mesons from the origin in the upper
> > > atmosphere to their arrival at a counter on the earth's surface. The
> > > observer "sees" the origin from his frame and since he is "looking" at the
> > > meson then this point is only a few feet above the laboratory roof because
> > > of the Lorenz contraction.
>
> > No, not at all.
> > The observer on the ground knows that and where in the upper
> > atmosphere muons (and other stuff) are created. Also knowing
> > how short muons live on the average, he calculates that there
> > are much more muons reaching the ground than expected.
> > It turns out that if the "internal muon lifetime clocks" are slowed
> > down by the precisely the amount described by the equations,
> > the number that reaches the ground fits the expected value.
> > This is "time dilation" in action.
>
> Moortel Moortel what you call "how short muons live on average" your
> masters used to call "muon lifetime at rest". But they don't even
> mention it anymore. Why? Because people now know that this "muon
> lifetime at rest" is one of the greatest frauds ever devised by
> Einstein criminal cult:
>
> http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/threa...
>
> When the lifetime "at rest" is measured, by "at rest" Einstein
> criminal cult mean a crash undergone by the muon in which its speed
> changes from about 300000km/s to zero. That crash is so terrible that
> the muon "dies" quickly, much more quickly than muons that have not
> undergone the crash:
>
> http://web.mit.edu/c_hill/www/muons_paper.pdf
> "In this experiment, we measure two of the basic properties of the
> muon, namely, its mean lifetime and mass in its rest frame. We measure
> the decay curve of cosmic-ray muons that have come to rest in a
> plastic scintillator by looking for electrons produced in their
> decay."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Pentcho, motion is detectable because it always starts with an
acceleration. This is true for anything except freefall. Freefall you
can measure when you hit the ground. For weightless acceleration of
gravity the detection of motion happens at DECELERATION.

Either way motion is detectable.

Mitch Raemsch -- frerfalll --
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9d67d18f-ef6b-4ce0-9e9d-fb1e02c1e85a@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <yxNbj.40703$S37.3891@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <%XNbj.272023$cd4.14086374@phobos.telenet-ops.be> <3_idneNc1LzPfPLanZ2dnUVZ_rmjnZ2d@comcast.com> <Oc%bj.32554$JD.22477@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net> <8b528b31-761c-4b79-8f96-c1f254186ab6@r60g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,8d149610da36325f
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,6727d9b34b6efccb
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,6727d9b34b6efccb
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,6727d9b34b6efccb
X-Google-Thread: f55d3,6727d9b34b6efccb
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf55d3,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: BURT <macromitch@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, fr.sci.physique, 
 fr.sci.maths, fr.sci.philo
Subject: Re: I am confused by relativity
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:46:34 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <9d67d18f-ef6b-4ce0-9e9d-fb1e02c1e85a@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <yxNbj.40703$S37.3891@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk> 
 <%XNbj.272023$cd4.14086374@phobos.telenet-ops.be> <3_idneNc1LzPfPLanZ2dnUVZ_rmjnZ2d@comcast.com>
 <Oc%bj.32554$JD.22477@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net> <8b528b31-761c-4b79-8f96-c1f254186ab6@r60g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.175.7.167
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1198712794 29022 127.0.0.1 (26 Dec 2007 23:46:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 23:46:34 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.175.7.167; 
 posting-account=5ApcPgoAAABKcgEyKsQmJVb3Rz63IGGL
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; 
 .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)