Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #5942

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#5942

From: Jeckyl
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:09

20 lines
2578 bytes

"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message 
news:n468n3pt68a71a6t2b3sh879v7rvpognlb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:10:18 +1100, "Jeckyl" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>Irrelevant, as the detector is NOT stationary in the non-rotating frame ..
>>whne you doppler shift back to take the speed of the detectors into 
>>account,
>>they have the ame wavelength .  Gees .. this has been explained to you
>>countless times
>
> Listen you pathetic halfwit, the detector frame is NOT the nonrotating 
> frame.

THAT'S WHAT I'VE JUST BEEN TELLING YOU !!!  Gees, you're slow.

You have calculated the frequencies in the non-rotating frame and used that 
to conclude that the frequencies at the detector are difference .. that 
ASSUMES the detector is fixed in the non-rotating frame.  WRONG.  You need 
to apply a Doppler shift again, back to the detector frame (the rotating 
frame), and the frequencies are once again the same.  Same time of journey 
.. same frequency .. so it must be the same phase .. so NO Sagnac effect.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13n8c5mpkp17l7b@corp.supernews.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!sn-xt-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail

References:

<13mja0721544773@corp.supernews.com>  <LhNAg9CKKmaHFwVV@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <oDwaj.31038$lD6.2744@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>  <xrouyIGf99aHFwDR@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <dbCbj.59107$eY.10537@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net> <74c3ca82-0b16-4d14-8dda-54af7c3595c6@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <gcwcj.1095$se5.598@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <t3d5n391dh2d1u0puudooqie0ab1d1l05u@4ax.com> <13n75hlh2hjaff@corp.supernews.com> <n468n3pt68a71a6t2b3sh879v7rvpognlb@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,128cc9ce0b836800
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,128cc9ce0b836800
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,128cc9ce0b836800
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,128cc9ce0b836800
X-Google-Thread: f55d3,c8a8c8fa96d6fb1c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf55d3,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!sn-xt-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Jeckyl" <noone@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,fr.sci.philo
Subject: Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:09:31 +1100
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <13n8c5mpkp17l7b@corp.supernews.com>
References: <13mja0721544773@corp.supernews.com>  <LhNAg9CKKmaHFwVV@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <oDwaj.31038$lD6.2744@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>  <xrouyIGf99aHFwDR@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <dbCbj.59107$eY.10537@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net> <74c3ca82-0b16-4d14-8dda-54af7c3595c6@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <gcwcj.1095$se5.598@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <t3d5n391dh2d1u0puudooqie0ab1d1l05u@4ax.com> <13n75hlh2hjaff@corp.supernews.com> <n468n3pt68a71a6t2b3sh879v7rvpognlb@4ax.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message