Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5961Re: FORGET ABOUT EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE!
From: Dirk Van de moortel
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:00
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:00
38 lines
3779 bytes
3779 bytes
"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f01d260a-49b7-43a0-b1ad-85d5b1b590f7@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > http://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Curved-Spacetime-without-relativity/dp/0955706807 > Relativity in Curved Spacetime: Life without special relativity > by Eric Baird (Author) > "Relativity theory has become one of the icons of Twentieth Century > science. It's reckoned to be a difficult subject, taught as a layered > series of increasingly difficult mathematics and increasingly abstract > concepts. We're told that relativity theory is supposed to be this > complicated and counter-intuitive. But how much of this historical > complexity is really necessary? Can we bypass the interpretations and > paradoxes and pseudoparadoxes of Einstein's special theory and jump > directly to a deeper and more intuitive description of reality? What > if curvature is a fundamental part of physics, and a final theory of > relativity shouldn't reduce to Einstein's "flat" 1905 theory //on > principle//? "Relativity..." takes us on a whistlestop tour of > Twentieth Century physics - from black holes, quantum mechanics, > wormholes and the Big Bang to the workings of the human mind, and > asks: what would physics look like without special relativity?" Evolution in Selecting Nature: Life without Evolution by Beric Aird (Author) "Evolution theory has become one of the icons of Nineteenth Century science. It's reckoned to be a difficult subject, taught as a layered series of increasingly difficult common sense and increasingly abstract concepts. We're told that Evolution theory is supposed to be this complicated and counter-intuitive. But how much of this historical complexity is really necessary? Can we bypass the interpretations and paradoxes and pseudoparadoxes of Darwin's evolution theory and jump directly to a deeper and more intuitive description of reality? What if selection is a fundamental part of biology, and a final theory of Evolution shouldn't reduce to Darwin's "flat" 1859 theory //on principle//? "Evolution..." takes us on a whistlestop tour of Nineteenth Century biology - from black birds, quacking geese, hole worms and the Big Elephant to the workings of the human mind, and asks: what would biology look like without Evolution?" Dirk Vdm
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9%6bj.268699$GQ3.13610266@phobos.telenet-ops.be>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!68.142.88.75.MISMATCH!hwmnpeer01.ams!news.highwinds-media.com!kramikske.telenet-ops.be!nntp.telenet.be!kwabbernoot.telenet-ops.be!phobos.telenet-ops.be.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<f01d260a-49b7-43a0-b1ad-85d5b1b590f7@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,a762b5abab312b36 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,a762b5abab312b36 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,a762b5abab312b36 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,a762b5abab312b36 X-Google-Thread: f55d3,a762b5abab312b36 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf55d3,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!68.142.88.75.MISMATCH!hwmnpeer01.ams!news.highwinds-media.com!kramikske.telenet-ops.be!nntp.telenet.be!kwabbernoot.telenet-ops.be!phobos.telenet-ops.be.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,fr.sci.philo References: <f01d260a-49b7-43a0-b1ad-85d5b1b590f7@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: FORGET ABOUT EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE! Lines: 40 Organization: @Home X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <9%6bj.268699$GQ3.13610266@phobos.telenet-ops.be> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:00:05 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.195.8.142 X-Complaints-To: abuse@telenet.be X-Trace: phobos.telenet-ops.be 1198324805 84.195.8.142 (Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:00:05 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:00:05 MET