Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5992Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
From: Tom Roberts
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:36
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:36
39 lines
3266 bytes
3266 bytes
Pentcho Valev wrote: > On Dec 17, 6:01 pm, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in > sci.physics.relativity: >> John Kennaugh wrote: >>> Jeckyl wrote: >>>> Emission theory, however, is refuted by Sagnac. >>> No. It is completely in agreement with Emission theory. >>> I know how ballistic theory explains it >> But nobody else does..... > > YOU do Roberts Roberts. Not true. It's just that you are unable to read. <shrug> > You even claim that > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/c1614c38b6219a06? > Tom Roberts: "There's no need for relativistic kinematics in > discussing the Sagnac effect.....at the Planck scale the fundamental > structure of the world is not continuous." Yes, there is indeed no need for relativistic KINEMATICS in discussing the Sagnac effect. If you had read this IN THE CONTEXT IT AS WRITTEN you would understand that. Other aspects of SR apply and explain the Sagnac effect, and quantitatively agree with the measurements. Your "....." omits too much, and the words following it have no relationship to the words preceding it. > So don't be inconsistent Roberts Roberts. I am not. It is YOU who quote words out of context, intermix different statements made by others, and don't understand what they say. <shrug> Grow up. Tom Roberts
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<27I9j.25009$4V6.12035@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr14.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!32b1cbcb!not-for-mailReferences:
<a59fe998-d3d5-41d7-9f97-7c28eb6bb919@w34g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <qDWoYHGollZHFwbg@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <13mcraaoe9e3e84@corp.supernews.com> <TPJmrsAU2oZHFwsu@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <J3x9j.54151$eY.31069@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net> <2ab16491-1897-404e-a4f4-4d10b7a825c7@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,128cc9ce0b836800 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,128cc9ce0b836800 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,128cc9ce0b836800 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,128cc9ce0b836800 X-Google-Thread: f55d3,c8a8c8fa96d6fb1c X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf55d3,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr14.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!32b1cbcb!not-for-mail From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,fr.sci.philo Subject: Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY References: <a59fe998-d3d5-41d7-9f97-7c28eb6bb919@w34g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <qDWoYHGollZHFwbg@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <13mcraaoe9e3e84@corp.supernews.com> <TPJmrsAU2oZHFwsu@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> <J3x9j.54151$eY.31069@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net> <2ab16491-1897-404e-a4f4-4d10b7a825c7@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <2ab16491-1897-404e-a4f4-4d10b7a825c7@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 39 Message-ID: <27I9j.25009$4V6.12035@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.131.98.59 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr14.news.prodigy.net 1197952574 ST000 70.131.98.59 (Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:36:14 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:36:14 EST Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: OH\GBW[DWJWWC\D[_X_JJFXBWR\HPCTL@XT^OBPLAH[\BTUCCNSKQFCY@TXDX_WHSVB]ZEJLSNY\^J[CUVSA_QLFC^RQHUPH[P[NRWCCMLSNPOD_ESALHUK@TDFUZHBLJ\XGKL^NXA\EVHSP[D_C^B_^JCX^W]CHBAX]POG@SSAZQ\LE[DCNMUPG_VSC@VJM Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:36:14 GMT