🚀 go-pugleaf

AKGMJC@gmail.com:
 > On Dec 12, 8:53 am, mL <mL.bey...@elsewhere.xxx> wrote:
 >> AKG...@gmail.com wrote:
 >>> On Dec 11, 7:08 pm, mL <mL.bey...@elsewhere.xxx> wrote:
 >>>> AKG...@gmail.com wrote:
 >>>> ...
 >>>>> Einstein did not understand secondary school mathematics just 
like all
 >>>>> other Einsteinians.
 >>>> .. and the evidence for that statement is ?
 >>>>> Secondary school students learn that
 >>>>> (x^2-y^2)/(x-y)=x+y only under the restriction that x is not 
equal to -
 >>>>> y.
 >>>> .. so what?
 >>> Did you know it?
 >> Why do you bring up a triviality?

 > Because you and your god do not undertsand it...

You really have the annoying habit of making
unsupported judgements about others.

 >   ... Many mathematical formulas carry restrictions due to
 > the proof involved. Your bad habit of reading things without
 > considering the context is making you makefool of your self
 > here agin. This "triviality" is not understood by
 > Einstein as in the following phrase shows:

 >>> If you did why did you not see that c+c=c is not a
 >>> theorem of SR?

That "phrase" is your non-sensical invention entirely,
so it shows nothing about anything but yourself.

 > In the relativiistic addition of velocities, one cannot set v=c as LT
 > is undefined there. The formula of relativisitc addition of speed
 > comes from LT. So, it is not as trivial as you thought, Einstein did
 > not understand this basic secondary school mathematics.

More unsupported judgements.  Try focusing on your arguments
to make them less muddled instead.

[ More of the same:
    "Einstein did not understand ..",
    "Einstein thought that ..",
    "Einstein could not see ..",
     etc. ]

Not much left.

 >>> The standard of mathematical education now is way more ahead of
 >>> Einstein's time. Even a good undergarduate maths student is way more
 >>> advanced mathematically than Einstein or Minkowski.

 >> Apparently you are not fit to judge.

 > It is not up to you to make this judgement. You said nothing
 > scientific. Just try to learn some very basic science and mathematics.
 > Then we may have some meaningful discusssion. So far all what has been
 > made clear is that you do not understand what you are talking about.
 > No substance no nonsense. The forum deserves a little more than what
 > you have been offering.

I see - you are stating rules and guidelines about judgements,
discussions and such.  Do you have any intention to follow
your own advices henceforth?

Finally, since you are so obsessed by Einstein, and so full of
preconceived notions, take at look at some of his work here:

http://einstein-annalen.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/annalen/alphabetical

/mel