Re: THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #6063

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#6063

From: Igor
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:48

18 lines
2399 bytes

On Nov 20, 7:18 pm, Shubee <e.Shu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2:38 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that PHYSICS CANNOT
> > BE BASED UPON THE FIELD CONCEPT, that is on continuous structures.
> > Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the
> > theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary
> > physics."
>
> I agree with Einstein on this one obvious statement.
>
> Shubeehttp://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/directory.htm

It's good to hear that you agree with Einstein.  Perhaps you even
understand what he meant by that.  Considering that most of physics,
even in his own day, was based on the field concept, it's never been
very clear to a lot of people exactly what he was trying to say.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <0fbf583a-853b-44ea-9cf3-82969c531ec3@n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<dd9e761c-4034-470b-8690-65ddc7dabaeb@i37g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <7bc09c2d-1a0b-4aea-ba79-3bde211d8189@l22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,6c49e2858065bda0
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,6c49e2858065bda0
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,6c49e2858065bda0
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,6c49e2858065bda0
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,6c49e2858065bda0
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Igor <thoovler@excite.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.astro, fr.sci.physique, 
 fr.sci.maths
Subject: Re: THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <0fbf583a-853b-44ea-9cf3-82969c531ec3@n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
References: <dd9e761c-4034-470b-8690-65ddc7dabaeb@i37g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> 
 <7bc09c2d-1a0b-4aea-ba79-3bde211d8189@l22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.205.191.53
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195670922 24302 127.0.0.1 (21 Nov 2007 18:48:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:48:42 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=128.205.191.53; 
 posting-account=UM3jRwkAAADTHFmJ20qgwageu031CeWA
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 
 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Content-Disposition: inline

Reply to Parent Message