Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #607Re: DOUBLETHINK AND RELATIVISM IN EINSTEINIANA
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:41
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:41
101 lines
7274 bytes
7274 bytes
TRUTH: http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/YBA/M31-velocity/doppler-shift-derive-2.html "However, if the siren is moving towards the stationary observer, then the distance between successive wavecrests is reduced by the distance traveled by the source during one period. This resulting decreased wavelength..." In this case Einsteiniana's teachers establish the LIE (which is always one leap ahead of the truth) in an implicit way: the reader gets the impression that, even if the observer were moving towards the stationary wave source, the wavelength would decrease again (and the speed of the wave relative to the observer would remain CONSTANT, that is, believers sing "Divine Einstein" and go into convulsions). Pentcho Valev wrote: Pernicious relativism in Einsteiniana: As you start moving against waves, wavecrests start hitting you more frequently, that is, their speed relative to you increases. In Einsteiniana this trivial (but very dangerous) truth is replaced by a new truth: wavecrests start hitting you more frequently because the wavelength somehow depends on your speed and decreases as soon as you start moving against the waves (accordingly, the wavecrests continue hitting you with CONSTANT SPEED, that is, believers sing "Divine Einstein" and go into convulsions): http://sampit.geol.sc.edu/Doppler.html "Moving observer: A man is standing on the beach, watching the tide. The waves are washing into the shore and over his feet with a constant frequency and wavelength. However, if he begins walking out into the ocean, the waves will begin hitting him more frequently, leading him to perceive that the wavelength of the waves has decreased. Again, this phenomenon is due to the fact that the source and the observer are not the in the same frame of reference. Although the wavelength appears to have decreased to the man, the wavelength would appear constant to a jellyfish floating along with the tide." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/big_bang/index.html John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)." Now the top of a tower sends light towards the ground and the frequency increases again: F'=F(1+V/c^2), where F is the frequency measured at the top, F' is the frequency measured at the ground and V is the gravitational potential difference between the top and the ground. The old Newtonian truth is: wavecrests hit the ground more frequently because their speed has increased between the top and the ground: c'=c(1+V/c^2). Einsteinians hate the old Newtonian truth because it implies that wavecrests hit an accelerated observer with speed c'=c+v, where v is the speed of the emitter relative to the observer. Accordingly, two additional truths have replaced the old Newtonian truth in Einsteiniana: (1) Wavecrests hit the ground more frequently because clocks at the top of the tower somehow run faster than clocks at the ground. Accordingly, wavecrests hit the ground with UNCHANGED SPEED c'=c, that is, believers sing "Divine Einstein" and go into convulsions. (2) Wavecrests hit the ground with frequency F'=F(1+V/c^2) but their speed relative to the ground is greater than in the old Newtonian truth: the new speed is c'=c(1+2V/c^2). Believers accept this new truth as well but sing "Divine Einstein" without enthusiasm and do not go into convulsions. http://www.liferesearchuniversal.com/1984-17.html#seventeen George Orwell: "Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge ; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth. (...) It need hardly be said that the subtlest practitioners of doublethink are those who invented doublethink and know that it is a vast system of mental cheating. In our society, those who have the best knowledge of what is happening are also those who are furthest from seeing the world as it is. In general, the greater the understanding, the greater the delusion ; the more intelligent, the less sane." Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<eb493e68-7b3e-48ac-8885-c93c29e5247a@v14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<25a88b38-001a-4343-8436-1794397fbec3@y14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <4BB8F5DB.FD1DC170@hate.spam.net> <5a2842d2-6468-4432-80b8-e65b3c50596b@j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <772005e8-86af-4e19-ba4d-c090a1abd209@8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <4ee0810f-04e4-4130-8a56-870a49e24860@s9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <f7f4a5ea-27d9-4c38-9758-c1eb25ac670f@g30g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <728182eb-88e9-44d4-a833-a1b1eaaff775@u21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 111645,434f8840f6f1d194 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: Re: DOUBLETHINK AND RELATIVISM IN EINSTEINIANA Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 101 Message-ID: <eb493e68-7b3e-48ac-8885-c93c29e5247a@v14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> References: <25a88b38-001a-4343-8436-1794397fbec3@y14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <4BB8F5DB.FD1DC170@hate.spam.net> <5a2842d2-6468-4432-80b8-e65b3c50596b@j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <772005e8-86af-4e19-ba4d-c090a1abd209@8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <4ee0810f-04e4-4130-8a56-870a49e24860@s9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <f7f4a5ea-27d9-4c38-9758-c1eb25ac670f@g30g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <728182eb-88e9-44d4-a833-a1b1eaaff775@u21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.54.163.41 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1271914877 26794 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2010 05:41:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.54.163.41; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; AskTB5.5),gzip(gfe)