Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #6074

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#6074

From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:52

21 lines
2515 bytes

On 19 Nov, 16:35, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
> Juan R. wrote:
> > In recent years, we are more convinced that both special and general
> > relativity need deep reconsideration.
>
>    Interesting, given the neither theory's predictions have ever
>    been contradicted by an observation.

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001743/02/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as
evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas later writers almost
universally use it as support for the light postulate of special
relativity......THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE
WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT
POSTULATE."

Later writers teach zombie. Now zombie confused. Tomorrow zombie
confused. Forever zombie confused. Later writers guilty.

Pentcho Valev

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2f00b7cc-41e3-4746-89a2-4342dd955d61@d61g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d61g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References: <7c6a7ffd-114f-44a0-bac4-9199d4470be9@f13g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <Rah0j.188183$Xa3.67342@attbi_s22>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,47d765a5a9e66332
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,47d765a5a9e66332
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,3259f17751c2c9a1
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,3259f17751c2c9a1
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,3259f17751c2c9a1
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d61g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.astro, fr.sci.physique, 
 fr.sci.maths
Subject: Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <2f00b7cc-41e3-4746-89a2-4342dd955d61@d61g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
References: <7c6a7ffd-114f-44a0-bac4-9199d4470be9@f13g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> 
 <Rah0j.188183$Xa3.67342@attbi_s22>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.159
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195487523 32072 127.0.0.1 (19 Nov 2007 15:52:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:52:03 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d61g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.159; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET 
 CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Content-Disposition: inline

Reply to Parent Message