Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6076Re: Muon Question
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:23
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:23
34 lines
3272 bytes
3272 bytes
On 19 Nov, 17:02, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 19, 1:51 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On 19 Nov, 05:24, Peri of Pera <rie...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in > > sci.physics.relativity: > > > > How many relativistic frames are involved when we observe or deal with > > > space muons in the atmosphere? Are we in an observer frame and the > > > muons in an observed frame? If so what are the mathematical and > > > logical relationships between these two frames? > > > Peter Riedt > > > What is crucial in this case is the definition of "muons at rest". > > When the lifetime "at rest" is measured, by "at rest" Einstein > > criminal cult mean a crash undergone by the muon in which its speed > > changes from about 300000km/s to zero. That crash is so terrible that > > the muon "dies" quickly, much more quickly than muons that have not > > undergone the crash: > > What makes muons so fragile? Why don't protons, electrons, > or most other particles fall apart under this "terrible" crash? > > - Randy Randy Randy your masters will not like your argument. For so many years they have been trying to explain to Einstein zombie world that muons with such a short lifetime are "at rest", and now your reference to terrible crash and fragility, although intended to be ironic, will make your masters stick their heads in the sand, expose other parts of their bodies and remain so until the danger is over. Don't mention "terrible crash" anymore Randy Randy. No irony is relevant when the tragedy is so huge. Pentcho Valev
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a9a749ed-bce4-4755-98f7-dd37a9440fc2@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<ba4caf76-6e38-435f-a0ab-ff0a2b6445a3@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <c1e91bfe-a342-4d58-9385-97b3eebf862b@a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <62edba8b-c142-4c1e-9d19-2c6b620aa15e@f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,1e2a14c4aea9afc5 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,4f4205831fe52e20 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,4f4205831fe52e20 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,4f4205831fe52e20 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,4f4205831fe52e20 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.astro, fr.sci.physique, fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: Muon Question Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:23:12 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 35 Message-ID: <a9a749ed-bce4-4755-98f7-dd37a9440fc2@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> References: <ba4caf76-6e38-435f-a0ab-ff0a2b6445a3@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <c1e91bfe-a342-4d58-9385-97b3eebf862b@a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <62edba8b-c142-4c1e-9d19-2c6b620aa15e@f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.159 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195489393 8874 127.0.0.1 (19 Nov 2007 16:23:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.159; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Content-Disposition: inline