🚀 go-pugleaf

"Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. DOT .- t> wrote in message
news:ar3rj35ji0m309f9rg1vcvtgmoh7brbekt@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:09:47 GMT, "Androcles"
> <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Don Stockbauer" <donstockbauer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:2c9106b8-832c-47bd-886d-915d61dbfd00@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >: But the fact that the "speed" (really velocity) of light is constant,
> >: independent of the motions of the source and the receiver, is one of
> >: the most firmly established principles of science.
> >:
> >: But ---- what is the light moving relative to????????
> >
> >The source, of course.
> >
> >The fiction that the "speed" (really velocity) of light is constant,
> >independent of the motions of the source and the receiver, is one of the
> >stupidest unestablished loads of crap in Nature.
> >
> The truth is: every measurement of c yields the same value.
> Nobody has ever measured something different (within error bars)
> and nobody says: velocity IS constant (or not), everybody nowadays
> refers to what one measures, except Androcles, that fisherman in the
> sea of wisdom  with his broken fishing rod.

The speed of light is measured to be constant because it is based on the
circular definition for a meter length.....1 meter =1/299,792,458
light-second. If physical length of ruler is used to measure light speed
then the speed of light is variable.

Ken Seto
>
> Androcles is the stupidest established crackpot in the Universe.
> ahahaaa........except hanson, pentcho, traveler, ahahhaaa,
> there is actually no stupidest one, they outdo each other
> every other day.
>
> w.
>
> Precision time dilatation measurements:
>
> http://www.pro-physik.de/Phy/leadArticle.do?laid=9851