Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6099Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
From: Laurent
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:50
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:50
63 lines
4959 bytes
4959 bytes
On Nov 15, 8:47 pm, Carlos L <carlo...@lix.intercom.es> wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2:13 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Pentcho, if you take the time to understand the conventional concepts > > of electromagnetic waves and the works of James Clerk Maxwell, there > > is simply no reason to persit in the belief that a "luminiferous > > aether" exists. Also, the aether theory has so many holes in it that > > it can be dismissed out of hand. The most notable of these is the > > notion that the aether can propagate transverse waves, somthing it > > itself that would require the aether to be a solid, since only a solid > > media transmits transverse waves, which makes it a bit difficult for > > the earth to traverse through it. > > [...] > > I hope that this post does not stomp on anyone's toes. It is intended > > to be helpful. > > > Harry C > > Harry, a big hole in mainstream Physics is to argue that the aether > must be a solid because light produces transversal forces. (I agree > that AFAIK only a solid can propagate *standard transversal waves* but > this is not important once it is understood that light waves are not > standard transversal waves). > > This is the abstract of a section of the "EVE model of the aether": > ---------------- > It has often been argued that if the aether is the medium for the > transmission of electromagnetic waves it must have the mechanical > properties of rigid solids since only then it could be able to sustain > transversal waves that are the basis to explain the polarization of > such waves. It is here argued that an aether of aetherinos (that has > more in common with a rarefied gas than with a solid) is also able to > exert transversal forces and to implement the polarization of > electromagnetic waves. An aetherino travelling from an emitter E to a > detector R along the straight line E-R imparts an impulse i to the > detector. This impulse will also have a component perpendicular to E-R > if the elementary detector (i.e. an electron of the detector) is > itself moving with a non zero component of its velocity perpendicular > to E-R. It is here argued that in this model of the aether this > transversal impulse is not trivial since it has the following two > characteristics: 1) The transversal impulses suffered by an > elementary detector from a flow of aetherinos modulated in such a way > that the density of aetherinos in the flow is periodically smaller and > bigger than that of the standard undisturbed aether, will alternately > (with the same periodicity of the aetherino's flow) increase and > decrease the transversal velocity of the target electron. 2) Such > resonance will be favoured if the transversal direction is coincident > with the preferred direction in which the charges of the emitter > oscillate because it is along such direction that the density gradient > of aetherinos manifests itself at the detector. > ---------------- > > http://www.ineunte.com/model/EVE7/Eve7.htm > > I also hope that this post does not stump on anyone's toes. It is > intended to be helpful. > > Carlos L The aether is but does not exist as matter or anything else. Light creates spacetime as it propagates. -- Laurent
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4f994edc-bb6b-4eec-95ba-b525672b57d8@a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <44945028-7600-49a4-af30-b3933aecf7b8@f80g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <8031c33f-7335-4989-aaae-5782e7ee1c51@b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Laurent <cyberdyno@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.astro, fr.sci.physique, fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY? Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:50:13 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 63 Message-ID: <4f994edc-bb6b-4eec-95ba-b525672b57d8@a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <44945028-7600-49a4-af30-b3933aecf7b8@f80g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <8031c33f-7335-4989-aaae-5782e7ee1c51@b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.136.49.226 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195228213 5192 127.0.0.1 (16 Nov 2007 15:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.136.49.226; posting-account=cJjKIwoAAACsyp3tgjnURi2FhLFcMDet User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; FDM),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 cache02iad (NetCache NetApp/5.5R6) Content-Disposition: inline