🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6099

Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?

#6099
From: Laurent
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:50
63 lines
4959 bytes
On Nov 15, 8:47 pm, Carlos L <carlo...@lix.intercom.es> wrote:
> > On Nov 13, 2:13 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Pentcho, if you take the time to understand the conventional concepts
> > of electromagnetic waves and the works of James Clerk Maxwell, there
> > is simply no reason to persit in the belief that a "luminiferous
> > aether" exists.  Also, the aether theory has so many holes in it that
> > it can be dismissed out of hand.  The most notable of these is the
> > notion that the aether can propagate transverse waves, somthing it
> > itself that would require the aether to be a solid, since only a solid
> > media transmits transverse waves, which makes it a bit difficult for
> > the earth to traverse through it.
> > [...]
> > I hope that this post does not stomp on anyone's toes. It is intended
> > to be helpful.
>
> > Harry C
>
>  Harry, a big hole in mainstream Physics is to argue that the aether
> must be a solid because light produces transversal forces. (I agree
> that AFAIK only a solid can propagate *standard transversal waves* but
> this is not important once it is understood that light waves are not
> standard transversal waves).
>
> This is the abstract of a section of the "EVE model of the aether":
> ----------------
> It has often been argued that if the aether is the medium for the
> transmission of electromagnetic waves it must have the mechanical
> properties of rigid solids since only then it could be able to sustain
> transversal waves that are the basis to explain the polarization of
> such waves. It is here argued that an aether of aetherinos (that has
> more in common with a rarefied gas than with a solid) is also able to
> exert transversal forces and to implement the polarization of
> electromagnetic waves. An aetherino travelling from an emitter E to a
> detector R along the straight line E-R imparts an impulse i to the
> detector. This impulse will also have a component perpendicular to E-R
> if the elementary detector (i.e. an electron of the detector) is
> itself moving with a non zero component of its velocity perpendicular
> to E-R. It is here argued that in this model of the aether this
> transversal impulse is not trivial since it has the following two
> characteristics:   1) The transversal impulses suffered by an
> elementary detector from a flow of aetherinos modulated in such a way
> that the density of aetherinos in the flow is periodically smaller and
> bigger than that of the standard undisturbed aether, will alternately
> (with the same periodicity of the aetherino's flow)  increase and
> decrease the transversal velocity of the target electron. 2) Such
> resonance will be favoured if the transversal direction is coincident
> with the preferred direction in which the charges of the emitter
> oscillate because it is along such direction that the density gradient
> of aetherinos manifests itself at the detector.
> ----------------
>
> http://www.ineunte.com/model/EVE7/Eve7.htm
>
> I also hope that this post does not stump on anyone's toes. It is
> intended to be helpful.
>
> Carlos L

The aether is but does not exist as matter or anything else. Light
creates spacetime as it propagates.

--
Laurent
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4f994edc-bb6b-4eec-95ba-b525672b57d8@a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <44945028-7600-49a4-af30-b3933aecf7b8@f80g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <8031c33f-7335-4989-aaae-5782e7ee1c51@b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Laurent <cyberdyno@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.astro, fr.sci.physique, 
 fr.sci.maths
Subject: Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:50:13 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <4f994edc-bb6b-4eec-95ba-b525672b57d8@a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> 
 <44945028-7600-49a4-af30-b3933aecf7b8@f80g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <8031c33f-7335-4989-aaae-5782e7ee1c51@b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.136.49.226
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195228213 5192 127.0.0.1 (16 Nov 2007 15:50:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:50:13 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a28g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.136.49.226; 
 posting-account=cJjKIwoAAACsyp3tgjnURi2FhLFcMDet
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 
 1.1.4322; FDM),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 cache02iad (NetCache NetApp/5.5R6)
Content-Disposition: inline