Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6110Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
From: Koobee Wublee
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:43
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:43
46 lines
3593 bytes
3593 bytes
On Nov 15, 11:04 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote: > Koobee Wublee wrote: > > There are other hypotheses that predict the same result. <shrug> > > > Besides, it is not conclusive that GPS utilizes GR to do so. To do > > that, it requires a ground-to-satellite synchronization. This is just > > too costly and too error-prone. In addition to the error associated > > with downlink from satellite to the ground, there is just too much > > error compared to satellite-to-satellite synchronization. > > > With physicists as consultants, GPS most likely did start out with > > ground-to-satellite synchronization, but engineers quickly figured out > > the unnecessary introduction of error can be eliminated if satellite- > > to-satellite synchronization is implemented. > 1) Idiot. > 2) Relativistic effects on orbital clocks > <http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-1&page=node5....> > 3) Idiot > 4) Lithium ions as clocks at 0.06c to 10^(-7) accuracy > <http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/1113/2> "Einstein was wrong" A plagiarist can never be wrong. However, the plagiarized material can be wrong. <shrug> "Special relativity joins space and time into a single weird thing called spacetime that appears different to observers moving relative to each other." Even the crackpot cannot explain exactly what this weird thing is. <shrug> "Einstein reasoned that if the ion were accelerated to near-light speed, time would slow for it and, hence, so would the rippling of the emitted light waves. That is, the speeding ions would emit light of a lower frequency." Einstein's reasoning contradicts with transverse Doppler shift predicted by the Lorentz transform. SR is not self consistent. <shrug> > 5) Idiot. > 6) Ineducable idiot.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<e799c4de-0334-4cf2-abd6-ae4a6b365b50@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1195049809.138105.216890@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1195067212.124049.138420@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1195075837.810601.168270@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <c4e0efc9-ac98-4fe3-b434-2a78c0b5eec0@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <473C984F.6EDA3A2@hate.spam.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.astro, fr.sci.physique, fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY? Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:43:25 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 46 Message-ID: <e799c4de-0334-4cf2-abd6-ae4a6b365b50@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1195049809.138105.216890@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1195067212.124049.138420@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1195075837.810601.168270@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <c4e0efc9-ac98-4fe3-b434-2a78c0b5eec0@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <473C984F.6EDA3A2@hate.spam.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.146.134.190 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195159405 13043 127.0.0.1 (15 Nov 2007 20:43:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.146.134.190; posting-account=PTS84AoAAACr67p51zvy0Hlr3LkoIUcc User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Content-Disposition: inline