Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6113Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
From: Carlos L
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:47
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:47
60 lines
4529 bytes
4529 bytes
> On Nov 13, 2:13 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Pentcho, if you take the time to understand the conventional concepts > of electromagnetic waves and the works of James Clerk Maxwell, there > is simply no reason to persit in the belief that a "luminiferous > aether" exists. Also, the aether theory has so many holes in it that > it can be dismissed out of hand. The most notable of these is the > notion that the aether can propagate transverse waves, somthing it > itself that would require the aether to be a solid, since only a solid > media transmits transverse waves, which makes it a bit difficult for > the earth to traverse through it. > [...] > I hope that this post does not stomp on anyone's toes. It is intended > to be helpful. > > Harry C Harry, a big hole in mainstream Physics is to argue that the aether must be a solid because light produces transversal forces. (I agree that AFAIK only a solid can propagate *standard transversal waves* but this is not important once it is understood that light waves are not standard transversal waves). This is the abstract of a section of the "EVE model of the aether": ---------------- It has often been argued that if the aether is the medium for the transmission of electromagnetic waves it must have the mechanical properties of rigid solids since only then it could be able to sustain transversal waves that are the basis to explain the polarization of such waves. It is here argued that an aether of aetherinos (that has more in common with a rarefied gas than with a solid) is also able to exert transversal forces and to implement the polarization of electromagnetic waves. An aetherino travelling from an emitter E to a detector R along the straight line E-R imparts an impulse i to the detector. This impulse will also have a component perpendicular to E-R if the elementary detector (i.e. an electron of the detector) is itself moving with a non zero component of its velocity perpendicular to E-R. It is here argued that in this model of the aether this transversal impulse is not trivial since it has the following two characteristics: 1) The transversal impulses suffered by an elementary detector from a flow of aetherinos modulated in such a way that the density of aetherinos in the flow is periodically smaller and bigger than that of the standard undisturbed aether, will alternately (with the same periodicity of the aetherino's flow) increase and decrease the transversal velocity of the target electron. 2) Such resonance will be favoured if the transversal direction is coincident with the preferred direction in which the charges of the emitter oscillate because it is along such direction that the density gradient of aetherinos manifests itself at the detector. ---------------- http://www.ineunte.com/model/EVE7/Eve7.htm I also hope that this post does not stump on anyone's toes. It is intended to be helpful. Carlos L
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8031c33f-7335-4989-aaae-5782e7ee1c51@b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <44945028-7600-49a4-af30-b3933aecf7b8@f80g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Carlos L <carlosla@lix.intercom.es> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.astro, fr.sci.physique, fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY? Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:47:04 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 60 Message-ID: <8031c33f-7335-4989-aaae-5782e7ee1c51@b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <44945028-7600-49a4-af30-b3933aecf7b8@f80g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.77.120.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195177625 28025 127.0.0.1 (16 Nov 2007 01:47:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.77.120.6; posting-account=KuSjcAkAAABoC3Sx1bCJ51jntIRDoDNo User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Content-Disposition: inline