🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6130

Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?

#6130
From: Koobee Wublee
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:06
16 lines
2375 bytes
On Nov 14, 6:16 am, Laurent wrote:

> There is no absolute space, only absolute reality. The Universe is
> background free.

Under the mathematics of the Lorentz transform, absolute simultaneity
is forbidden.  The mathematical manifestation of the Lorentz transform
is the combination of time dilation and the principle of relativity.
Poincare had already identified this as relative simultaneity.
Relative simultaneity is the root cause of the twin's paradox.  Under
the concept of relative simultaneity, any interference pattern cannot
happen.  The interferometers should not have worked.  Since
interferometers work so well and everytime ever so consistently, the
most logical conclusion is that relative simultaneity must not
possibly be valid.  This also means the Lorentz transform must be
wrong.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1195067212.124049.138420@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1195049809.138105.216890@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths
Subject: Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:06:52 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <1195067212.124049.138420@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <1195049809.138105.216890@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.146.134.190
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1195067212 23679 127.0.0.1 (14 Nov 2007 19:06:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:06:52 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1195049809.138105.216890@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.146.134.190;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0