Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6145NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:13
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:13
27 lines
2691 bytes
2691 bytes
http://ias.umn.edu/pdf/TimeandRelativity-Pooley.pdf p. 11: "Problem for Lorentz's theory: no sign of ether drift (= motion of ether with respect to earth). Many failed attempts to detect ether drift, one of the most famous ones by Americans Albert A. Michelson (1852-1931) and Edward W. Morley (1838-1923). Explanation: compensating effect: length of interferometer arm changes as it rotates: parallel to ether drift it is shorter than perpendicular to the ether drift Contraction (deformation) hypothesis: an object moving with a velocity v through the ether contracts by a factor (1-v^2 c^2)^(1/2) in the direction of motion." Another explanation that essentially could have been advanced by FitzGerald, Lorentz etc. if they had been less prejudiced in favour of the ether theory: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001743/02/Norton.pdf John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas later writers almost universally use it as support for the light postulate of special relativity......THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." Which explanation would have been more correct? Pentcho Valev
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e1ebd9321ee85e88,start X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e1ebd9321ee85e88,start X-Google-Thread: f74ae,e1ebd9321ee85e88,start X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e1ebd9321ee85e88,start X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,e1ebd9321ee85e88,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths Subject: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY? Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:13:44 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 28 Message-ID: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.160 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1194938025 14245 127.0.0.1 (13 Nov 2007 07:13:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:13:45 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.160; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0